e-
> > De : bob mcwhirter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Envoyé : mardi 20 juillet 2004 20:28
> > À : Maven Developers List
> > Objet : RE: JIRA issues pertaining to versions
> >
> > On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> >
> > > What
+1 from me
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mardi 20 juillet 2004 20:42
> To: 'Maven Developers List'
> Subject: RE: JIRA issues pertaining to versions
>
> I think (if others are agree) that it could be a good
I know I'm late on this, but I'll throw in my +1 anyway.
-j
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 13:47, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 13:32, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Also I noticed that there are many outdated issues, more than a year old,
> > that should be closed without losing ti
It should be changed for maven-plugins or it will be a nightmare with so
many plugins.
> -Original Message-
> From: bob mcwhirter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 8:28 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: JIRA issues pertaining to versi
n Developers List
> Objet : RE: JIRA issues pertaining to versions
>
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>
> > What JIRA role is needed to add versions to plugins?
>
> Well, whatever role is specified by the project.
>
> I think Maven requires jira-adm
You must be administrator :-(
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Carlos Sanchez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : mardi 20 juillet 2004 20:24
> À : 'Maven Developers List'
> Objet : RE: JIRA issues pertaining to versions
>
> What JIRA role
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> What JIRA role is needed to add versions to plugins?
Well, whatever role is specified by the project.
I think Maven requires jira-administrator, but that can certainly
be changed.
It could become maven-developers, or we could create yet-another
group
What JIRA role is needed to add versions to plugins?
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 8:15 PM
> To: 'Maven Developers List'
> Subject: RE: JIRA issues pertaining to versions
>
> +1 fo
+1 for me.
I think that we also should apply theses rules for the plugins (even if there are less
bugs).
I found a lot of closed issues with no "fixed version".
Arnaud
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : mardi 20 juillet 2004 17:51
> À : Maven
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 13:32, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> +1
>
> Also I noticed that there are many outdated issues, more than a year old,
> that should be closed without losing time trying to reproduce them.
Agreed, I started making a sweep which is what lead me to propose the
reorganization of the
+1
Also I noticed that there are many outdated issues, more than a year old,
that should be closed without losing time trying to reproduce them.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 5:51 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subj
+1. I'd like it if the notification was turned off while this is suffeled
around, I don't want 100 jira mails popping up at the same time, too much
clutter.
--
Trygve
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 11:50:59AM -0400, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure what the standard practice is for queuing
Sounds good to me.
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mardi 20 juillet 2004 17:51
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: JIRA issues pertaining to versions
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure what the standard practice is for queuing up issues to
13 matches
Mail list logo
