Brett Porter wrote:
(c) support only ranges [,]; (,); etc
+1, I agree with Paul and Stephen, the version range syntax supports a
superset of the +/- suffix and is already established in Maven land so
we should save ourselves from maintaining the other code.
Benjamin
-
st 1.5" etc.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:br...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 11:28 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: JDK ranges
>
> Ah, I misread it. I thought 1.4 was [1.4,1.5) in the enforcer (Which
> is how it wo
Yep. In the context of the enforcer this was most natural, since you
would normally say "enforcer jdk is at least 1.5" etc.
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:br...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 11:28 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: JDK ran
Ah, I misread it. I thought 1.4 was [1.4,1.5) in the enforcer (Which
is how it works in the profiles).
- Brett
On 05/02/2009, at 3:15 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Just a clarification, the enforcer impl treats "1.4" as 1.4+ or more
literally [1.4,). This slightly overrides the version range inter
Just a clarification, the enforcer impl treats "1.4" as 1.4+ or more
literally [1.4,). This slightly overrides the version range internally
because in that case "1.4" = (,) with a recommended version of 1.4.
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:br...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday
c +1
a 0
b -1
Sent from my [rhymes with myPod] ;-)
On 4 Feb 2009, at 23:25, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
First of all, kudos to Benjamin for knocking out my latest issues IT
while I slept (I hear he is actually capable of knocking them out in
his sleep :)
Due to an interesting change histor
