On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 13:58, Steve Garcia wrote:
> > > Now, if project B's pom is stored in the local repo with no
> > properties
> > > resolved (i.e. the pom file is not the interpolated
> > version) then project
> > > A needs to have definitions for these properties. This would not be
> > > p
> > Now, if project B's pom is stored in the local repo with no
> properties
> > resolved (i.e. the pom file is not the interpolated
> version) then project
> > A needs to have definitions for these properties. This would not be
> > possible unless the properties files are also made
> availabl
>
>
>
> Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 05/01/2004 03:23 PM
> Please respond to "Maven Developers List"
>
>
> To: Maven Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc:
> Subject:Re: Installed POMS not inte
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael A Melia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:39 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: Installed POMS not interpolated
>
>
> Hi Jason,
> I checked on irc a few times but was unable to catch up
To: Maven Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: Installed POMS not interpolated
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 23:09, Michael A Melia wrote:
> > I think extension from the local repository solves this problem, but I
> > would still like
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 23:09, Michael A Melia wrote:
I think extension from the local repository solves this problem, but I
would still like to know if you are using interpolation within the
dependnecy elements themselves as that is something I would like to
formally limit i
t"
To: Maven Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: Installed POMS not interpolated
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 23:09, Michael A Melia wrote:
> > I think extension from the local repository solves this problem, but I
> > wo
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 23:09, Michael A Melia wrote:
> > I think extension from the local repository solves this problem, but I
> > would still like to know if you are using interpolation within the
> > dependnecy elements themselves as that is something I would like to
> > formally limit if possibl
> I think extension from the local repository solves this problem, but I
> would still like to know if you are using interpolation within the
> dependnecy elements themselves as that is something I would like to
> formally limit if possible.
Yes, I am using properties for version numbers. e.g. ${r
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 02:37, Michael A Melia wrote:
> To clarify my assumptions:
>
> [usual transitive dependency scenario]
>
> I have project A dependent on project B which is dependent on project C
> and project D.
> I need for project A to pick up the dependencies (C and D) from project B.
>> Also, I've notiiced that the poms that are installed in the local repo
are
>> not interpolated. My solution would rely on the installed poms having
been
>> interpolated already.
> That wouldn't be a good idea. One of the things I've been striving for
> in the new maven code is to keep the
> Also, I've notiiced that the poms that are installed in the local repo
are
> not interpolated. My solution would rely on the installed poms having
been
> interpolated already.
That wouldn't be a good idea. One of the things I've been striving for
in the new maven code is to keep the model
On Sat, 2004-01-03 at 21:54, Michael A Melia wrote:
> I'm looking at providing the capability for transitive dependencies in
> Maven which would (in my eyes) rely on the pom files being installed in
> the poms directory in the local repository.
> I've noticed that only ejb, ear and war projects i
13 matches
Mail list logo