RE: Installed POMS not interpolated

2004-01-06 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 13:58, Steve Garcia wrote: > > > Now, if project B's pom is stored in the local repo with no > > properties > > > resolved (i.e. the pom file is not the interpolated > > version) then project > > > A needs to have definitions for these properties. This would not be > > > p

RE: Installed POMS not interpolated

2004-01-06 Thread Steve Garcia
> > Now, if project B's pom is stored in the local repo with no > properties > > resolved (i.e. the pom file is not the interpolated > version) then project > > A needs to have definitions for these properties. This would not be > > possible unless the properties files are also made > availabl

Re: Installed POMS not interpolated

2004-01-05 Thread Jason van Zyl
> > > > Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 05/01/2004 03:23 PM > Please respond to "Maven Developers List" > > > To: Maven Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc: > Subject:Re: Installed POMS not inte

RE: Installed POMS not interpolated

2004-01-05 Thread Michal Maczka
> -Original Message- > From: Michael A Melia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:39 PM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: Installed POMS not interpolated > > > Hi Jason, > I checked on irc a few times but was unable to catch up

Re: Installed POMS not interpolated

2004-01-05 Thread Michael A Melia
To: Maven Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: Re: Installed POMS not interpolated On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 23:09, Michael A Melia wrote: > > I think extension from the local repository solves this problem, but I > > would still like

Re: Installed POMS not interpolated

2004-01-05 Thread Ryan Hoegg
Jason van Zyl wrote: On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 23:09, Michael A Melia wrote: I think extension from the local repository solves this problem, but I would still like to know if you are using interpolation within the dependnecy elements themselves as that is something I would like to formally limit i

Re: Installed POMS not interpolated

2004-01-04 Thread Michael A Melia
t" To: Maven Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: Re: Installed POMS not interpolated On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 23:09, Michael A Melia wrote: > > I think extension from the local repository solves this problem, but I > > wo

Re: Installed POMS not interpolated

2004-01-04 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 23:09, Michael A Melia wrote: > > I think extension from the local repository solves this problem, but I > > would still like to know if you are using interpolation within the > > dependnecy elements themselves as that is something I would like to > > formally limit if possibl

Re: Installed POMS not interpolated

2004-01-04 Thread Michael A Melia
> I think extension from the local repository solves this problem, but I > would still like to know if you are using interpolation within the > dependnecy elements themselves as that is something I would like to > formally limit if possible. Yes, I am using properties for version numbers. e.g. ${r

Re: Installed POMS not interpolated

2004-01-04 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 02:37, Michael A Melia wrote: > To clarify my assumptions: > > [usual transitive dependency scenario] > > I have project A dependent on project B which is dependent on project C > and project D. > I need for project A to pick up the dependencies (C and D) from project B.

Re: Installed POMS not interpolated

2004-01-04 Thread Michael A Melia
>> Also, I've notiiced that the poms that are installed in the local repo are >> not interpolated. My solution would rely on the installed poms having been >> interpolated already. > That wouldn't be a good idea. One of the things I've been striving for > in the new maven code is to keep the

Re: Installed POMS not interpolated

2004-01-04 Thread Michael A Melia
> Also, I've notiiced that the poms that are installed in the local repo are > not interpolated. My solution would rely on the installed poms having been > interpolated already. That wouldn't be a good idea. One of the things I've been striving for in the new maven code is to keep the model

Re: Installed POMS not interpolated

2004-01-03 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sat, 2004-01-03 at 21:54, Michael A Melia wrote: > I'm looking at providing the capability for transitive dependencies in > Maven which would (in my eyes) rely on the pom files being installed in > the poms directory in the local repository. > I've noticed that only ejb, ear and war projects i