Re: Documentation for 4.x/3.x plugins and components

sounds good. +1. Thanks On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 12:49 PM Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > > Hi, > > After discussion I think that model like: > > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-clean-plugin/ > - documentation for branch 3.x > > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-clean-plugin-4.x/ > - doc

Re: Documentation for 4.x/3.x plugins and components

Hi, After discussion I think that model like: https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-clean-plugin/ - documentation for branch 3.x https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-clean-plugin-4.x/ - documentation for master version 4.x and according to above for stage version https://maven.apache.org/

Re: Documentation for 4.x/3.x plugins and components

On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 8:50 AM Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > I would like to maintain both versions only for some of the core > plugins - in order to test / check the new API from Maven 4. > > As Maven 4 still supports plugins for Maven 3 - we can switch the rest > of plugins after the release fin

Re: Documentation for 4.x/3.x plugins and components

On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 at 09:23, Hervé Boutemy wrote: > > BTW I hope we won't end up with 3 vs 4 components, isn't it? > all plugins is already a huge added maintenance I would like to maintain both versions only for some of the core plugins - in order to test / check the new API from Maven 4. As Ma

Re: Documentation for 4.x/3.x plugins and components

On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 at 07:44, Hervé Boutemy wrote: > > site plugin has a big history of parallel 3 vs 4: it's probably a good > location to look at for learning As I remember we didn't talk about documentation publishing for both versions. > > need to add new columns to https://maven.apache.org/p

Re: Documentation for 4.x/3.x plugins and components

how couldnt we generate v3 from v4 api and get it for free with a compat layer for a few years - and keep a single bundle? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | .NET Blog | Blog | Old Blog

Re: Documentation for 4.x/3.x plugins and components

Yes, it looks like most of the components will also be affected as for example we should switch to new Maven dependencies or get rid off Plexus/Inject pt., 7 lut 2025, 09:23 użytkownik Hervé Boutemy napisał: > BTW I hope we won't end up with 3 vs 4 components, isn't it? > all plugins is already

Re: Documentation for 4.x/3.x plugins and components

BTW I hope we won't end up with 3 vs 4 components, isn't it? all plugins is already a huge added maintenance Le vendredi 7 février 2025, 07:44:12 CET Hervé Boutemy a écrit : > site plugin has a big history of parallel 3 vs 4: it's probably a good > location to look at for learning > > need to add

Re: Documentation for 4.x/3.x plugins and components

site plugin has a big history of parallel 3 vs 4: it's probably a good location to look at for learning need to add new columns to https://maven.apache.org/plugins/ ? see also impact on README linking to 2 last releases in Maven Central Regards, Hervé Le jeudi 6 février 2025, 20:09:31 CET Mat

Re: Documentation for 4.x/3.x plugins and components

Hi, what about combining both and being a bit future proof? https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-clean-plugin-3.x/ https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-clean-plugin-4.x/ and https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-clean-plugin/ [or LATEST] points to 3.x now, when 4 is release to 4.x, when

Re: Documentation for 4.x/3.x plugins and components

Hi, Maybe in such way: https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-clean-plugin/ - documentation for branch 3.x https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-clean-plugin-4.x/ - documentation for master version 4.x and according to above for stage version https://maven.apache.org/plugins-archives/maven-

Re: Documentation for 4.x/3.x plugins and components

Makes sense. Just let's not jump the gun. That is, don't change the URLs and don't publish the 4.x docs at the existing URLs until Maven 4 is released. If you want to publish the docs now, you could publish both https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-clean-plugin-3.x/ and https://maven.apache.org/p

Re: Documentation 404 links

Please create a PR for  https://github.com/apache/maven-toolchains-plugin/blob/master/src/site/apt/index.apt.vm thanks, Robert On 17-7-2021 02:44:32, leerho wrote: The docs page for the maven-toolchains-plugin has 4 non-working links: user mailing list -> https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-to

RE: Documentation error?

Thanks for the clarification. Although, I use JRE_HOME to point to my JRE 8-) Ioannis Deligiannis| Senior Application Engineer -Original Message- From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu] Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 2:42 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re

Re: Documentation error?

Ioannis Deligiannis wrote: Is states the following: ${java.home}/../lib/tools.jar If not obvious, let say that java.home=c:\java\jdk1 But this should resolve to: C:\java\lib\tools.jar which is wrong. Usually, ${java.home} points to the private JRE of the JDK, e.g. JAVA_HOME=D:\Programme\Jav

Re: Documentation for import scope

ast minute. --Brian -Original Message- From: Ralph Goers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 6:35 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Documentation for import scope I updated the introduction to dependency mechanism page and built the site locally. I then checked it in.

RE: Documentation for import scope

Ralph, I'll gladly publish the site...just commit the guide and have a nice vacation! Thanks for pulling it together last minute. --Brian -Original Message- From: Ralph Goers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 6:35 PM To: Maven Developers List Subjec

Re: Documentation for import scope

I updated the introduction to dependency mechanism page and built the site locally. I then checked it in. The last time I did this was in September and I can't for the life of me remember how to publish the site - I remember logging in to people.apache.org and doing some stuff over there. I've

RE: Documentation for import scope

That's good, but it's better to have an actual IT that gets run too. -Original Message- From: Ralph Goers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 11:09 PM To: Maven Developers List Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Documentation for import scope There is

Re: Documentation for import scope

: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Documentation for import scope http://marc.info/?l=turbine-maven-dev&m=119061621617466&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=turbine-maven-dev&m=119061621501107&w=2 These were reverted. I just need to get it back and make some minor updates. Ralph Brett Porter

RE: Documentation for import scope

Ralph: can we get some Its for this too? We want to make 2.0.9 final this week. -Original Message- From: Ralph Goers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 8:32 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Documentation for import scope http://marc.info/?l=turbine

Re: Documentation for import scope

Cool. On 29/02/2008, at 12:31 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: http://marc.info/?l=turbine-maven-dev&m=119061621617466&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=turbine-maven-dev&m=119061621501107&w=2 These were reverted. I just need to get it back and make some minor updates. Ralph Brett Porter wrote: On 29/02/20

Re: Documentation for import scope

http://marc.info/?l=turbine-maven-dev&m=119061621617466&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=turbine-maven-dev&m=119061621501107&w=2 These were reverted. I just need to get it back and make some minor updates. Ralph Brett Porter wrote: On 29/02/2008, at 11:22 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: I checked it in before

Re: Documentation for import scope

On 29/02/2008, at 11:22 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: I checked it in before so it is still in SVN. I just have to put that version back on top. Sorry, not quite sure what you mean - can you point me to it? Where do the release notes go? site/src/site/apt/release-notes.apt.vm - I was going to

Re: Documentation for import scope

I checked it in before so it is still in SVN. I just have to put that version back on top. Where do the release notes go? Ralph Brett Porter wrote: I think this is mostly for Ralph... I wasn't able to find any documentation for the import scope in the site. I was wondering if you could add a

Re: Documentation Plan

The layout below with stated modifications sounds good to me. See also on archiva-dev today: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> under "[proposal] Move Archiva's wiki to cwiki.apache.org" for the different types I'd like to see. I think the documentation can be deployed to /docs/1.1, /docs/1.0.3, etc. Che

Re: Documentation Plan

On 9/24/07, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For 1.0.3 doc, we'll let it as is but we must remove specific 1.1 doc in it. How will this be handled? Do we need continuum/1.0.3 and continuum/1.1 on the website? -- Wendy

Re: Documentation Plan

Agree on this comments. User Guide could be the second entry. The structure is fine. (now we have to populate this) -- Olivier 2007/9/24, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > The order is a little odd. > I would personally put the User's Guide as more important than the > Developer's Guides.

Re: Documentation Plan

The order is a little odd. I would personally put the User's Guide as more important than the Developer's Guides. The FAQ should be higher in the list too. - Joakim Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, Here is the structure of the documentation I'd like to have for 1.1-final. Installation/Up

Re: Documentation

: Piéroni Raphaël [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: mardi 14 mars 2006 10:43 > > > To: Maven Developers List > > > Subject: Re: Documentation > > > > > > At home, my wiki is dokuwiki (and linux) > > > > > > What is the tool to use ? >

Re: Documentation

PROTECTED] > > Sent: mardi 14 mars 2006 10:43 > > To: Maven Developers List > > Subject: Re: Documentation > > > > At home, my wiki is dokuwiki (and linux) > > > > What is the tool to use ? > > > > my favorite goes to http://docs.codeh

Re: Documentation

it. I've been increasing my productivity by tenfolds with it. > > Just an idea... > > -Vincent > > > -Original Message- > > From: Piéroni Raphaël [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: mardi 14 mars 2006 10:05 > > To: Maven Developers List &

RE: Documentation

> -Original Message- > From: Piéroni Raphaël [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: mardi 14 mars 2006 10:43 > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: Documentation > > At home, my wiki is dokuwiki (and linux) > > What is the tool to use ? > > my favorite

RE: Documentation

> -Original Message- > From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: mardi 14 mars 2006 10:26 > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: RE: Documentation > > Vincent Massol wrote on Tuesday, March 14, 2006 10:21 AM: > > > Raphael, > > > >

Re: Documentation

At home, my wiki is dokuwiki (and linux) What is the tool to use ? my favorite goes to http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Home as it will be nearer to what we will produce. Vincent, i use netbeans and not eclipse :) Regards Raphaël 2006/3/14, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Vin

RE: Documentation

Vincent Massol wrote on Tuesday, March 14, 2006 10:21 AM: > Raphael, > > If you're doing to be doing some serious editing, I really recommend > that you use TimTam. It's an offline confluence editor that runs in > Eclipse. It's really worth it. I've been increasing my productivity > by tenfolds w

RE: Documentation

; -Original Message- > From: Piéroni Raphaël [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: mardi 14 mars 2006 10:05 > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: Documentation > > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Home > > Here is the documentation wiki. > > I will upload

Re: Documentation

http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Home Here is the documentation wiki. I will upload tonite all i have on my private wiki. Which is only a starting point. Regards Raphaël 2006/3/14, Piéroni Raphaël <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Which wiki is the good one ? > The one hosted by apache or the

Re: Documentation

Which wiki is the good one ? The one hosted by apache or the one hosted at codehaus ? And how difficult is it to have write access ? Regards, Raphaël 2006/3/14, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Ok the Maven team already offer a wiki to help write documentation so > I guess we should s

Re: Documentation

Ok the Maven team already offer a wiki to help write documentation so I guess we should start writing there. I will give it a try as soon as possible. On 3/13/06, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cool! My idea was to start a structured wiki like Wikipedia to be able > to work as a te

Re: Documentation

Cool! My idea was to start a structured wiki like Wikipedia to be able to work as a team but I don't want to create another unreadable wiki like most Apache projects already have. It's great for development efforts but not enough for end users. I'll take a look at the discussion first and see from

Re: Documentation

Hi Alexandre, There is actually a discussion about the improvement of the site on the dev list. May you subscribe and participate ? I also created a Jira issue for a proposition of improvment: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2143 Regards, Raphaël 2006/3/13, Wayne Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Re: Documentation

Alexandre, I'll be glad to help you in this effort, especially with the difficult English bits. ;-) Wayne On 3/13/06, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok I am getting tired to hear Maven documentation is awful. It is such > a wonderful product, I really want to see it adopted massi

Re: Documentation

Hi,I'm willing to add some documentation, because I want to get to know how to do it. Where is the source code of the site now?regards,Wim2005/12/1, Emmanuel Venisse < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:Hi all,Actually maven-scm site is very poor. Are you volunteers to write some docs?We need :- explanations of sc

Re: documentation: broken links

On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 13:08 +0200, jerome lacoste wrote: > http://maven.apache.org/maven2/guides/introduction/introduction-to-plugins.html > > The following links are broken: > > Resources > >1. Plugin development guide >2. Managing plugin configuration in large projects >3. Configur