Aye, I'd kinda like to see it go actually... its just extra fat and
gristle IMO.
--jason
On Sep 3, 2007, at 5:38 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 3 Sep 07, at 5:35 PM 3 Sep 07, Jason Dillon wrote:
Ya, death to the shell of the beans, long live Groovy king
blissful Maven scripting :-)
* *
-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 8:54 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Decoupling scripting modules from the core
+1, always have been "separate" (ie, not distributed).
But wouldn't a script module be better since there is a fe
Putting them together under a common parent/folder like
doxia/surefire/enforcer would make sense.
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 8:54 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Decoupling scripting modules from the core
+1
+1, always have been "separate" (ie, not distributed).
But wouldn't a script module be better since there is a few related
things?
Cheers,
Brett
On 04/09/2007, at 10:16 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
Right now the most popular scripting options are for Groovy and
JRuby so I would like to
+1, I saw those once and was a little surprised to see them in core, I
thought for a second I checked out the wrong folder ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 8:16 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Decoupling scripting
On 3 Sep 07, at 5:35 PM 3 Sep 07, Jason Dillon wrote:
Ya, death to the shell of the beans, long live Groovy king blissful
Maven scripting :-)
* * *
Though I gotta admit the ~280k bean-shell runtime jar is still
really impressive for what the language can do. :-)
Yes, nonetheless it w
Ya, death to the shell of the beans, long live Groovy king blissful
Maven scripting :-)
* * *
Though I gotta admit the ~280k bean-shell runtime jar is still really
impressive for what the language can do. :-)
--jason
On Sep 3, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
Right now the
