rahul and I chatted last night on irc a bit and I cobbled this
together as an example using the Security page that carlos put
together and the mailing list thread..
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUM/CPSI+-+Security+Model
so, does anyone see the value in this more formal approach? I rat
hi everyone,
I have been trying to help emmanuel some with pulling together the
roadmap for Continuum 1.1 on the wiki and maybe help organize some of
the discussions on there.
I wanted to get out the url to the wiki roadmap and maybe see how you
guys feel about the content on it. I tried to pul
> On 28/06/2006 8:01 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> > I assume for this we are going to release a series of alphas? How
> > about for each major feature implemented we release an alpha?
>
> When we last discussed it on the development process, we
> talked about instead doing regular promotion of
+1 to most stuff, comments inline.
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Hi,
I started to define the roadmap of continuum 1.1. It will be done
normally tomorrow.
The major first things to do in this roadmap are:
- Reimplementation of authentication/authorization management
(CONTINUUM-542 and CONTINUUM-5
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
ok, I think the roadmap is done now. We have 159 issues.
Dude, it has only been 5 hours. I have a few comments that I would like
to express but I won't have time until later tonight.
--
Trygve
How about building without Sun JARs? Is that an achievable goal for 1.1?
On 29/06/2006 12:40 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
ok, I think the roadmap is done now. We have 159 issues.
I'll be happy if we can include all these issues in 1.1 :-)
Emmanuel
Emmanuel Venisse a écrit :
Hi,
I started to
On 28 Jun 06, at 11:25 AM 28 Jun 06, Brett Porter wrote:
On 28/06/2006 8:01 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I assume for this we are going to release a series of alphas? How
about for each major feature implemented we release an alpha?
When we last discussed it on the development process, we talke
On 28/06/2006 8:01 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I assume for this we are going to release a series of alphas? How about
for each major feature implemented we release an alpha?
When we last discussed it on the development process, we talked about
instead doing regular promotion of the automated bui
