Re: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-14 Thread jerome lacoste
On 6/14/06, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: jerome lacoste wrote: > I am not so sure this test is a valid test case. Continuations are > supposedly allowed. Read my comment in your issue in Jira. I believe, you are misreading the specification. A continuation is defined as otherchar*

Re: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-14 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
jerome lacoste wrote: > I am not so sure this test is a valid test case. Continuations are > supposedly allowed. Read my comment in your issue in Jira. I believe, you are misreading the specification. A continuation is defined as otherchar* newline. But otherchar is defined as anything but NUL, C

Re: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-14 Thread jerome lacoste
On 6/14/06, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Kenney Westerhof wrote: > Wasn't the line ending stuff fixed in plexus-archiver a long time ago? Running the attached test case (which might well be added to the plexus-archiver, whenever it should be fixed) demonstrates: No. Where is the

Re: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-14 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLX > component plexus-archiver Thanks, issue created. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-14 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLX component plexus-archiver Jochen Wiedmann a écrit : Kenney Westerhof wrote: Wasn't the line ending stuff fixed in plexus-archiver a long time ago? Running the attached test case (which might well be added to the plexus-archiver, whenever it should be fixed

Re: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-14 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Kenney Westerhof wrote: > Wasn't the line ending stuff fixed in plexus-archiver a long time ago? Running the attached test case (which might well be added to the plexus-archiver, whenever it should be fixed) demonstrates: No. Where is the plexus archivers issue tracker so that I can file an issu

Re: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-10 Thread Carlos Sanchez
On 6/10/06, Jeff Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2006 1:27 PM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: Commit MJAR-38 > > On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, Mike Perha

RE: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-10 Thread Jeff Jensen
> -Original Message- > From: Mike Perham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2006 1:37 PM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: RE: Commit MJAR-38 > > Side note: is there a way to get Outlook 2003 to quote like > below (with > > in

RE: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-10 Thread Mike Perham
> indents) rather than pushing the original message down? It would certainly make interleaving replies easier. -Original Message- From: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2006 1:27 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Commit MJAR-38 On Sat, 10 Jun 2006

RE: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-10 Thread Jeff Jensen
> -Original Message- > From: Kenney Westerhof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2006 1:27 PM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: Commit MJAR-38 > > On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, Mike Perham wrote: > > > Side note: I don't use Subv

Re: Commit MJAR-38

2006-06-10 Thread Kenney Westerhof
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, Mike Perham wrote: > This is a patch against 2.0.x maven-archiver which allows the user to > override the default manifest entries placed by Maven and also cleans > all manifest entries of linebreaks so invalid manifests with linebreaks > are not created. We will also need to