On 4/10/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As I understand it, this one has been in a grey area for some time.
Firstly, to be clear, there's nothing legally wrong with what it's
doing - this is purely protecting users from getting code that is not
AL unsuspectingly.
Since the use of ch
On 4/10/07, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/9/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm no lawyer, but I was under the impression that with Java muck,
> that importing and referencing [L]GPL classes in non-[L]GPL code was
> not legit. Or is that just for GPL?
just GPL
A
Actually, that depends on who you ask. If you read the FSF site you'd
get the impression it is not. JBoss says it is. What is most important
is that according to what I've seen on Apache legal-discuss the project
can't have direct dependencies on LGPL'd software.
It would make a lot of sense
List
Subject: Re: Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL
As I understand it, this one has been in a grey area for some time.
Firstly, to be clear, there's nothing legally wrong with what it's
doing - this is purely protecting users from getting code that is not
AL unsuspectingly.
On 4/9/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm no lawyer, but I was under the impression that with Java muck,
that importing and referencing [L]GPL classes in non-[L]GPL code was
not legit. Or is that just for GPL?
just GPL
-
On Apr 9, 2007, at 3:46 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
As I understand it, this one has been in a grey area for some time.
Firstly, to be clear, there's nothing legally wrong with what it's
doing - this is purely protecting users from getting code that is
not AL unsuspectingly.
Since the use of
As I understand it, this one has been in a grey area for some time.
Firstly, to be clear, there's nothing legally wrong with what it's
doing - this is purely protecting users from getting code that is not
AL unsuspectingly.
Since the use of checkstyle is optional, and because we don't
'di
In a pom I agree, but from the CLI you can run checkstyle:check.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason
Dillon
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 3:36 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL
On Apr 9
On Apr 9, 2007, at 2:39 AM, Jerome Lacoste wrote:
On 4/9/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I personally have no love for GPL/LGPL,
why such hate ? :)
I didn't say hate :-P
I just don't have a love for it... most because its not friggen
compatible with the ASL :-P
I wish it was
On Apr 9, 2007, at 8:39 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
whole plugin will cause total havoc on existing builds. (As would
purging old versions of it)
It's the "optional" part that is important. Nothing from Apache
should
silently pull in LGPL dependencies.
Moving the plugin to Codehaus is probably
> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 10:37 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL
>
> On 4/9/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At the end of the link quoted below:
> > > a bridging api (which can resi
bject: Re: Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL
On 4/9/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the end of the link quoted below:
> > a bridging api (which can reside within the same project - so
> > can
> be hosted at apache) >will be used to access
endy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 10:37 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL
On 4/9/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the end of the link quoted below:
> > a bridging api (which can resid
On 4/9/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At the end of the link quoted below:
> a bridging api (which can reside within the same project - so can
be hosted at apache) >will be used to access these LGPL stuff to clearly
show its optional behaviour
This is probably the simplest thin
On 4/9/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At the end of the link quoted below:
> a bridging api (which can reside within the same project - so can
be hosted at apache) >will be used to access these LGPL stuff to clearly
show its optional behaviour
This is probably the simplest thin
ct: Re: Checkstyle, maven-checkstyle-plugin and LGPL
On 4/9/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey, I was just looking around at Checkstyle and noticed that it is
> licensed as LGPL. Is this legit? I was under the impression that
> Apache soft ware could not directl
On 4/9/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey, I was just looking around at Checkstyle and noticed that it is
licensed as LGPL. Is this legit? I was under the impression that
Apache soft ware could not directly use any LGPL or GPL licenses
software... which the maven-checkstyle-plugin
17 matches
Mail list logo
