RE: CI Grid, Windows and Paths

2009-01-09 Thread Jamie Whitehouse
. We just have to fool with the env a bit > more. > > The maven version used must have been updated by someone with access, > it's not updated automatically. > > -Original Message- > From: Brett Porter [mailto:br...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, December 23,

Re: CI Grid, Windows and Paths

2008-12-24 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Brian E. Fox wrote: However I don't think it's completely useless Sure, and I never meant to say that. I appreciate the grid as a great step towards easier cross-platform testing/debugging. because the testing and building once maven runs is the same. As I tried to outline, this doesn't

RE: CI Grid, Windows and Paths

2008-12-23 Thread Brian E. Fox
ore. The maven version used must have been updated by someone with access, it's not updated automatically. -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:br...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 7:08 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: CI Grid, Windows and Paths On 24/

Re: CI Grid, Windows and Paths

2008-12-23 Thread Brett Porter
On 24/12/2008, at 10:58 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Now my question, how do we want to handle that smoothly on the grid? I see three options: a) Simply avoid using Maven 2.0.x for affected builds b) Update the path translation in Maven 2.0.x to match 2.1.x c) Update the *.bat files to ensur