Le lundi 19 mai 2008, Brett Porter a écrit :
> So the change was just to allow numerical ordering for non-standard
> versions like alpha-1 vs alpha-11 and 5.0.9.0 vs 5.0.10.0 ?
Yes, these cases are the most common ones fixed.
I didn't work on the "pluggable version handling" part of the proposal: i
So the change was just to allow numerical ordering for non-standard
versions like alpha-1 vs alpha-11 and 5.0.9.0 vs 5.0.10.0 ?
That looks ok to me at first glance, but I'll take a closer look.
- Brett
On 16/05/2008, at 5:02 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
FYI, I just merged version comparison impr
FYI, I just merged version comparison improvement to artifact trunk.
2.1.x ITs are ok, both on my machine and on Sonatype's CI server
I hope everything is ok for everybody
Don't hesitate to ring me if anything goes wrong
regards,
Hervé
Le jeudi 01 mai 2008, Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
> Kenney sta
On 3-May-08, at 3:34 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
The change is only on version comparison, not version parsing to
dispatch info
to ArtifactVersion API, which would have probably more impact.
This still could potentially impact users.
Just for the record I think Kenney's proposal is good, soun
The change is only on version comparison, not version parsing to dispatch info
to ArtifactVersion API, which would have probably more impact.
AFAIK, version comparison is used only for version ranges, but I don't know
every aspect of Maven to be sure of this.
As asked by Jason, I'll try integrat
Le vendredi 02 mai 2008, Gilles Scokart a écrit :
> By the way, in which case did you need to compare 2 version?
> In ivy, we use it mostly for conflict resolution. But maven use a
> 'nearest' aproach. So I guess there is no need to compare version
> there.
>
> Is the impact limited to version ra
Le vendredi 02 mai 2008, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
> Wayne Fay wrote:
> > How is CR different from RC?
>
> I don't meant to say they are different, it's only another well-known
> qualifier, aliasing one from the existing list.
yes, I'll need to add an aliasing system: CR = RC, GA = ""
>
> > I th
Within JBoss a lot of our projects use CR and GA so that the versions can be
sorted alphabetically. At least that was the explanation given to me ;)
I think RC is more common in other places. Ideally I would like to see a
pluggable version parsing so that a given project could configure it's
2008/5/2 Benjamin Bentmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Wayne Fay wrote:
>
>
> > How is CR different from RC?
> >
>
> I don't meant to say they are different, it's only another well-known
> qualifier, aliasing one from the existing list.
>
>
>
> > I think I'd pick one and forget about the other.
> >
>
>
Wayne Fay wrote:
How is CR different from RC?
I don't meant to say they are different, it's only another well-known
qualifier, aliasing one from the existing list.
I think I'd pick one and forget about the other.
Is an option, we only need to make sure to clearly explain people that Mave
What's the impact to existing builds. My initial reaction is no-way in 2.0.x.
-Original Message-
From: Hervé BOUTEMY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 4:07 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Artifact Version Comparison
Kenney started a proposal http://docs.codehau
On 1-May-08, at 1:07 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Kenney started a proposal http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Versioning
with a implementation of a comparator.
I took his implementation, updated it to support comparison between
more
version schemes and integrated it to DefaultArtifactVersio
> The JBoss Product Versioning [0] suggests the following additional
> well-known qualifiers:
> - CR
> - FINAL
How is CR different from RC? One is Candidate Release, the other is
Release Candidate. I think I'd pick one and forget about the other.
Wayne
---
Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Kenney started a proposal
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Versioning
with a implementation of a comparator.
The JBoss Product Versioning [0] suggests the following additional
well-known qualifiers:
- CR
- FINAL
Benjamin
[0] http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/JBossProduc
14 matches
Mail list logo
