RE: Archive format for automated upload requests

2003-12-02 Thread Michal Maczka
> -Original Message- > From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 1:43 PM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: RE: Archive format for automated upload requests > > > Hi Jason, > > Jason van Zyl wrote on Tuesday, Dece

RE: Archive format for automated upload requests

2003-12-02 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 08:56, Erdfelt, Joakim wrote: > > Having an app to do uploads: +1 > > Allowing anyone to load artifacts with no security measures: > > -googleplex > > Should we consider having people/groups/organizations register > as uploaders, with a security key that they sign their up

Re: Archive format for automated upload requests

2003-12-02 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 08:50, Ben Walding wrote: > Having an app to do uploads: +1 > Allowing anyone to load artifacts with no security measures: -googleplex There will definitely need to be some security. I wouldn't turn it on for production mode without it. I've ask some folks and even sent a mes

Re: Archive format for automated upload requests

2003-12-02 Thread Ben Walding
Something needs to be done as it is unacceptable to let Joe Random upload into the repo. Signing is a good start. Erdfelt, Joakim wrote: Having an app to do uploads: +1 Allowing anyone to load artifacts with no security measures: -googleplex Should we consider having people/groups/organi

RE: Archive format for automated upload requests

2003-12-02 Thread Erdfelt, Joakim
> Having an app to do uploads: +1 > Allowing anyone to load artifacts with no security measures: > -googleplex Should we consider having people/groups/organizations register as uploaders, with a security key that they sign their uploaded archives withwith? Or is this just too much effort for

Re: Archive format for automated upload requests

2003-12-02 Thread Ben Walding
Having an app to do uploads: +1 Allowing anyone to load artifacts with no security measures: -googleplex (and if anyone adds a "priceless" line, I will personally send a hungry shark with laser beams to eat you) Jason van Zyl wrote: Howdy, I now have all the requisite bits and bobs (thanks stra

RE: Archive format for automated upload requests

2003-12-02 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 07:43, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Jason, > > Jason van Zyl wrote on Tuesday, December 02, 2003 12:42 PM: > > On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 22:52, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > As a start how about: > > > > - project.xml: which can be renamed with the info in the POM itself > > - license f

RE: Archive format for automated upload requests

2003-12-02 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Jason, Jason van Zyl wrote on Tuesday, December 02, 2003 12:42 PM: > On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 22:52, Jason van Zyl wrote: > As a start how about: > > - project.xml: which can be renamed with the info in the POM itself > - license file: do we have a standard name for this? > - artifact to be uploa

RE: Archive format for automated upload requests

2003-12-02 Thread Michal Maczka
> As a start how about: > > - project.xml: which can be renamed with the info in the POM itself > - license file: do we have a standard name for this? > - artifact to be uploaded > > Anything else? > > A simple zip/jar file would do as items can be easily extracted. > I think it is almost enough.

Re: Archive format for automated upload requests

2003-12-02 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 22:52, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Howdy, > > I now have all the requisite bits and bobs (thanks strachan) for a > little server that can process upload requests in an automated fashion > but I wouldn't mind a little input on the contents of the archive > uploaded and some ideas o