RE: About Maven3 M2Eclipse Plug-in Versioning Problem

2010-05-17 Thread Martin Gainty
//did you try setting the necessary properties in settings.xml or profiles.xml e.g.? appserverConfig 1.0 appserverConfig http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-profiles.html Martin Gainty __

Re: About Maven3 M2Eclipse Plug-in Versioning Problem

2010-05-17 Thread Stephen Connolly
No worries... though I need to call a vote to get a 3.0-beta-1 compatible version published 2010/5/17 Benjamin Bentmann > Barışcan Güngör wrote: > > [...] we >> >> could specify a variable for the application version in the parent pom, so >> that >> in the child poms we could able to specify th

Re: About Maven3 M2Eclipse Plug-in Versioning Problem

2010-05-17 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Barışcan Güngör wrote: [...] we could specify a variable for the application version in the parent pom, so that in the child poms we could able to specify the version by the same variable. That helps us saving our time for updating version number in each project upgrade and for reusability. Oh

Re: About Maven3 M2Eclipse Plug-in Versioning Problem

2010-05-17 Thread Stephen Connolly
You were relying on a bug. the following xpath:/project/parent/groupId, xpath:/project/parent/artifactId, xpath:/project/parent/version, xpath:/project/groupId, xpath:/project/artifactId, xpath:/project/version cannot ever reference a property as they are all evaluated before the model is availabl

Re: About Maven3 M2Eclipse Plug-in Versioning Problem

2010-05-17 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Barışcan Güngör wrote: Now the problem is in maven3 (m2eclipse) it gives a warning that says “version must be a constant instead of a variable”. A POM deployed to a repository must be self-contained in the way that all information required to process it (e.g. calculate the effective POM) mus