On 27 Mar 07, at 12:11 PM 27 Mar 07, David J. M. Karlsen wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
Before I staged the release I just wanted to get some people to a
build first:
http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/maven/
Brian, Jason Dillon, and Dan Kulp have tried their builds and I
just wante
David J. M. Karlsen wrote:
> I'm getting another issue on another project.
> It builds fine on maven 2.0.5, with the snapshot I get a problem with
> xdoclet - see the attached log.
>
>
> this realm = app0.child-container[org.codehaus.mojo:xdoclet-maven-plugin]
...
> urls[10] = file:/heim/ab62939/
David J. M. Karlsen skrev:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
Before I staged the release I just wanted to get some people to a
build first:
http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/maven/
Brian, Jason Dillon, and Dan Kulp have tried their builds and I just
wanted to get a little more feedback.
Based on the date, they are not. The correct one is in the staged repo
listed in the vote email.
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 12:26 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check
Have you tried the
David J. M. Karlsen wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
Before I staged the release I just wanted to get some people to a
build first:
http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/maven/
Brian, Jason Dillon, and Dan Kulp have tried their builds and I just
wanted to get a little more feedback.
Have you tried the staged released from yesterday night?
Jason -- are these these stages the same?
On 3/27/07, David J. M. Karlsen < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Before I staged the release I just wanted to get some people to a build
> first:
>
> http://idisk.mave
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
Before I staged the release I just wanted to get some people to a build
first:
http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/maven/
Brian, Jason Dillon, and Dan Kulp have tried their builds and I just
wanted to get a little more feedback.
Fails on surefire reports:
[I
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Before I staged the release I just wanted to get some people to a build
first:
http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/maven/
Brian, Jason Dillon, and Dan Kulp have tried their builds and I just
wanted to get a little more feedback.
Cocoon and Excalibur trunk build f
On 26 Mar 07, at 2:30 PM 26 Mar 07, mraible wrote:
All tests pass in AppFuse!
Cool, thanks. With that we have a pretty good round up. I'm still
poking around a bit and trying to throw some wrenches at the snapshot
but it seems to be holding up.
Jason.
Matt
Jason van Zyl-2 wrote:
All tests pass in AppFuse!
Matt
Jason van Zyl-2 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Before I staged the release I just wanted to get some people to a
> build first:
>
> http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/maven/
>
> Brian, Jason Dillon, and Dan Kulp have tried their builds and I just
> wanted to get a
keep track of
retired ITs and why they were retired.
jason.
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 10:23 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check
On 26 Mar 07, at 8:42 AM 26 Mar 07, Brian E. Fox wrote:
St
He shoots..He Scores!
Everything looks good now.
Is it0111 still valid if it wasn't finding this?
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 10:23 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check
On 26 Mar 07,
eagle eyes.
Jason.
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 12:42 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check
Your stuff is fixed.
Jason.
On 25 Mar 07, at 10:51 PM 25 Mar 07, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Since this
0111 is a checkstyle example.
Jason.
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 12:42 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check
Your stuff is fixed.
Jason.
On 25 Mar 07, at 10:51 PM 25 Mar 07, Brian E. Fox wrote:
On 26 Mar 07, at 9:50 AM 26 Mar 07, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On 3/26/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is happening internally is that to mimic the 2.0.5 I am
injecting p-u into all plugins and extensions. This is effectively
what happens with 2.0.5 where the root classloader ha
ochen Wiedmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 9:50 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check
On 3/26/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is happening internally is that to mimic the 2.0.5 I am
> injecting p-u into all plugi
At first glance, it does appear the same, except it works and my test
and my project both fail or succeed similarly.
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 9:47 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check
On 26
On 3/26/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is happening internally is that to mimic the 2.0.5 I am
injecting p-u into all plugins and extensions. This is effectively
what happens with 2.0.5 where the root classloader has p-u version
1.1. If this is not done then plugins like the r
Jason.
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 12:42 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check
Your stuff is fixed.
Jason.
On 25 Mar 07, at 10:51 PM 25 Mar 07, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Since this problem seems to come b
On 26 Mar 07, at 3:27 AM 26 Mar 07, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
So far so good. Except that on a project I have this warning now:
[WARNING]
Artifact org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils:jar:1.0.4:runtime
retains local scope 'runtime' overriding broader scope 'compile'
given by a dependenc
Still broken, except I added the correct it0114 file this time so you
can reproduce it. Sorry about that.
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 12:42 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check
Your stuff is
Tested on big projects and complex plugins: works great!
Fabrice.
On 3/26/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Before I staged the release I just wanted to get some people to a
build first:
http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/maven/
Brian, Jason Dillon, and Dan Kulp have tried
So far so good. Except that on a project I have this warning now:
[WARNING]
Artifact org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils:jar:1.0.4:runtime
retains local scope 'runtime' overriding broader scope 'compile'
given by a dependency. If this is not intended, modify or
remove the local scope.
rch 25, 2007 8:27 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: 2.0.6 Pre flight check
>
> I hate to say it, but this snapshot introduces a problem I didn't have
> last night. It seems like the extensions is messed up. I use jars that
> contain checkstyle and pmd rules, and both
abled in the suite.
--Brian
-Original Message-
From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 8:27 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: RE: 2.0.6 Pre flight check
I hate to say it, but this snapshot introduces a problem I didn't have
last night. It seem
Works for me.
On 26/03/2007, at 9:47 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
Before I staged the release I just wanted to get some people to a
build first:
http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/maven/
Brian, Jason Dillon, and Dan Kulp have tried their builds and I
just wanted to get a little more
On 25 Mar 07, at 8:27 PM 25 Mar 07, Brian E. Fox wrote:
I hate to say it, but this snapshot introduces a problem I didn't have
last night. It seems like the extensions is messed up. I use jars that
contain checkstyle and pmd rules, and both are now failing because it
can't find the rules. It's
ECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 8:27 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: RE: 2.0.6 Pre flight check
I hate to say it, but this snapshot introduces a problem I didn't have
last night. It seems like the extensions is messed up. I use jars that
contain checkstyle and pmd rules, and bo
I hate to say it, but this snapshot introduces a problem I didn't have
last night. It seems like the extensions is messed up. I use jars that
contain checkstyle and pmd rules, and both are now failing because it
can't find the rules. It's basically this again:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-27
29 matches
Mail list logo
