On 17-Jan-08, at 6:24 PM, Dan Fabulich wrote:
Responding out of order, techincal stuff first...
Daniel Kulp wrote:
The fact is MSHADE-9 is not something we can fix in maven-shade-
plugin. It's a bug in ASM and isn't fixable until they provide a
fix. (unless someone wants to jump into ASM
+1
--jason
On Jan 17, 2008, at 3:22 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Well, I'd prefer to not get into "version number" arguments as it
really
just doesn't matter.Hell, we have plugins (like the release
plugin,
dependency plugin, etc..) that EVERYONE uses that haven't had a real
release and ot
+1
dkulp wrote:
>
>
> I'd like to release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1 as I kind of need it
> for some of my projects. I think Geronimo may need it as well.
>
> This fixes a couple issues we'e run into:
>
> ** Bug
> * [MSHADE-11] - Shaded jars are not unjarrable
> * [MSHADE-13] -
Brian E. Fox wrote:
It's not entirely true that versions don't matter. Alpha or Beta is
really a less important distinction and we are generally trying to move
away from more alpha/beta releases. I would argue that since Maven
requires Shade to release, that the current version should be 1.0 not
DE-9 fix in it.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Fabulich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 9:25 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1
Responding out of order, techincal stuff first...
Daniel Kulp wrote:
The fact is MSHADE
I agree 100%, release often its the only way things really get used and tested
in the wild... if people have problems they can alway roll back to the last
release in the deps...
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:30:51 Brian E. Fox wrote:
...
> the people that need them. I'd rather see a release come out wi
AIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 9:25 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1
Responding out of order, techincal stuff first...
Daniel Kulp wrote:
> The fact is MSHADE-9 is not something we can fix in
maven-shade-plugin.
> It&#x
Responding out of order, techincal stuff first...
Daniel Kulp wrote:
The fact is MSHADE-9 is not something we can fix in maven-shade-plugin.
It's a bug in ASM and isn't fixable until they provide a fix. (unless
someone wants to jump into ASM code. I don't have the time.)
I'm not saying MSH
+1 get it out and that doesn't stop us from doing another release soon.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 6:22 PM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1
Well, I'd prefer
dkulp wrote:
>
> I'd like to release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1 as I kind of need it
> for some of my projects. I think Geronimo may need it as well.
>
OpenEJB, actually. And here's my +1! (non-binding)
-David
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--release-ma
Well, I'd prefer to not get into "version number" arguments as it really
just doesn't matter.Hell, we have plugins (like the release plugin,
dependency plugin, etc..) that EVERYONE uses that haven't had a real
release and others (like surefire) that never had a "alpha/beta"
release, but pr
I approve of the idea of releasing another version of maven-shade-plugin,
but I don't think we should call it non-alpha until MSHADE-9 is fixed.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSHADE-9
If this were called 1.0-alpha-16, I'd give it a +1; as it stands, I have
to vote -1 (non-binding).
-Dan
+1
On 16-Jan-08, at 11:57 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
I'd like to release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1 as I kind of need it
for some of my projects. I think Geronimo may need it as well.
This fixes a couple issues we'e run into:
** Bug
* [MSHADE-11] - Shaded jars are not unjarrable
* [MSH
13 matches
Mail list logo
