>
> I don't have time until early June, but would be happy to help you if
> you need by then.
Same thing for me.
We could think about this in June.
>
> > > Jerome
Arnaud
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For add
On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 00:50, Arnaud Heritier wrote:
>
> > I think you're reaching an interesting point here.
> >
> > The developer information should be retrieved from an external
> > repository, this being an LDAP or a simple global XML file shared by all
> > projects.
> >
> > Otherwise yo
> I think you're reaching an interesting point here.
>
> The developer information should be retrieved from an external
> repository, this being an LDAP or a simple global XML file shared by all
> projects.
>
> Otherwise you have a maintenance burdain on big projects.
>
> Furthermore, it i
Arnaud wrote:
> Yes. But we use the same declaration for a developer (or contributor) in
> several project.xml.
> Actually a developer is defined by a name, an email, ...
> Someone asked some month ago to have a messengerId.
> We can think that it all this data could be retrieved from a single
> r
> > I'm agree with you but the result is that all maven-plugins commiters
> are
> > developers for all plugins :-(
>
> Nope. They are potential plugin "developers" that's all.
Yes, potentially.
> >
> > Yes. I think that we can have developers with a commiter role but also
> > developers without
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnaud Heritier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 May 2004 22:39
> To: 'Maven Developers List'
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Remove developers from plugins project.xml
>
>
>
> > -Message d'origine-
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : mardi 11 mai 2004 18:02
> À : 'Maven Developers List'
> Objet : RE: [VOTE] Remove developers from plugins project.xml
>
...
>
> For me, developers are the persons
On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 11:26, Heritier Arnaud wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to propose that we remove the developers declaration in the pom
> for each plugin and that we use only the one in the plugin-parent.
>
> Why
>
> Because :
> - It will simplify the mainten
> -Original Message-
> From: Heritier Arnaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 May 2004 17:45
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Remove developers from plugins project.xml
>
> ok for this.
> But in this case we must use roles to define this.
x27;
> Objet : RE: [VOTE] Remove developers from plugins project.xml
>
>
> -1
>
> If section is missing in some plugins it should
> be added there.
>
>
> It should be clearly indicated who is a responsible for each
> of the plugins
> and who is "the man"
I'm -1 because more and more plugins will be considered as standalone
projects with their own lifecycle.
Thanks
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: Heritier Arnaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 May 2004 17:27
> To: Maven Dev (E-mail)
> Subject: [VOTE] Remove developers from plugi
-1
If section is missing in some plugins it should be added there.
It should be clearly indicated who is a responsible for each of the plugins
and who is "the man" which should be contacted
when any changes to plugin are going to be added. It's clear that each
plugin has different developers.
12 matches
Mail list logo
