I received at least 5 +1's no negatives and proceed releasing
maven-artifact-3.0-alpha-1
Thanks,
Oleg
John Casey wrote:
+1
Oleg Gusakov wrote:
Guys,
I re-released 3.0-alpha-1 with my key, manually, no automation :(
Please vote.
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi Oleg,
Looking at the release, the si
+1
Oleg Gusakov wrote:
Guys,
I re-released 3.0-alpha-1 with my key, manually, no automation :(
Please vote.
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi Oleg,
Looking at the release, the signatures are from a generic key. While
we're debating that in the other thread, for this release, can you
sign the artifac
On 23/07/2008, at 12:03 PM, Oleg Gusakov wrote:
Guys,
I re-released 3.0-alpha-1 with my key, manually, no automation :(
Sorry for the inconvenience - I only meant for the artifacts to be
signed again, not re-built :)
Please vote.
tested, checked signatures, checked licenses:
+1
Oleg Gusakov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 10:04 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release maven-artifact-3.0-alpha-1
Guys,
I re-released 3.0-alpha-1 with my key, manually, no automation :(
Please vote.
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi Oleg,
Looking at the re
Oleg, what's the new staging url?
-Original Message-
From: Oleg Gusakov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 10:04 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release maven-artifact-3.0-alpha-1
Guys,
I re-released 3.0-alpha-1 with my key, manually, no autom
Guys,
I re-released 3.0-alpha-1 with my key, manually, no automation :(
Please vote.
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi Oleg,
Looking at the release, the signatures are from a generic key. While
we're debating that in the other thread, for this release, can you
sign the artifacts using your own key, an
Hi Oleg,
Looking at the release, the signatures are from a generic key. While
we're debating that in the other thread, for this release, can you
sign the artifacts using your own key, and add that to the KEYS file
in SVN? Also, the signatures do not need to be checksummed.
Other than that
Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi,
2008/7/18, Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
-0 due to minor documentation errors:
- project url is specified to http://maven.apache.org/maven-artifact
in Project Summary and the deploy seems to be
http://maven.apache.org/ref/maven-artifact-3.0-alpha-
Hi,
2008/7/18, Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> -0 due to minor documentation errors:
> - project url is specified to http://maven.apache.org/maven-artifact
> in Project Summary and the deploy seems to be
> http://maven.apache.org/ref/maven-artifact-3.0-alpha-1/ so we need to
>
Hi,
Agree, and it is why I did not want to put a veto for this alpha.
+1 to release this as alpha and let s fix MARTIFACT-30 for 3.0
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/7/18, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I think as strict set of requires for a final release I would even say a -1
> from you would be va
I think as strict set of requires for a final release I would even say
a -1 from you would be valid. But as we move toward a final release I
think we can address this. I know you've been working to setup
consistent reporting and that can be used as a gauge for the final
release. For this al
Hi,
-0 due to minor documentation errors:
- project url is specified to http://maven.apache.org/maven-artifact
in Project Summary and the deploy seems to be
http://maven.apache.org/ref/maven-artifact-3.0-alpha-1/ so we need to
clarify it. I guess http://maven.apache.org/artifact will be fine.
- mi
+1
--jason
On Jul 18, 2008, at 8:58 AM, Oleg Gusakov wrote:
Hi,
16 issues fixed, no outstanding
Staging repo:
http://repository.sonatype.org:8081/nexus/content/repositories/staged-releases/maven-artifact/org/apache/maven/artifact/maven-artifact/3.0-alpha-1/
Staging site:
http://maven.apach
13 matches
Mail list logo
