Here the fault : http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/bcel/bcel/5.1/bcel-5.1.pom
--
Olivier
2009/3/11 John Casey :
> Could it be that the gwt-maven-plugin has a block that looks like this:
>
>
> blah
> ...
>
> It looks like a groupId nested immediately inside the dependencies
> collection element...t
Could it be that the gwt-maven-plugin has a block that looks like this:
blah
...
It looks like a groupId nested immediately inside the dependencies
collection element...that would be an invalid structure.
-john
Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
No issue here with company builds.
But I can't bui
Hi,
No issue here with company builds.
But I can't build the gwt-maven-plugin
(https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/mojo/gwt-maven-plugin)
mvn clean install -Prun-its
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO] Failed to install projec
Developers List
Subject: Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-RC1
Mistake on my part. I realized it when I started working on the
bugfixes
described in this thread. Sorry for the confusion. I'll amend the tag,
too, if you want...just so it's not sitting out there as 2.1.0.
-john
Brett Po
I would change the tag.
-Original Message-
From: John Casey [mailto:jdca...@commonjava.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 8:22 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-RC1
Mistake on my part. I realized it when I started working on the bugfixes
described in
On 12/03/2009, at 2:22 AM, John Casey wrote:
Mistake on my part. I realized it when I started working on the
bugfixes described in this thread. Sorry for the confusion. I'll
amend the tag, too, if you want...just so it's not sitting out there
as 2.1.0.
I don't think that matters too much,
Mistake on my part. I realized it when I started working on the bugfixes
described in this thread. Sorry for the confusion. I'll amend the tag,
too, if you want...just so it's not sitting out there as 2.1.0.
-john
Brett Porter wrote:
Just been generally using it and no additional problems.
J
2009/3/11 Brett Porter :
> I wouldn't think so. Can you file it as an issue (probably not a blocker...)
Done: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4082
> Yep, definitely, though be aware they won't work with older versions of
> Maven if you intend to switch.
>
> http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini
Just been generally using it and no additional problems.
Just curious - why 2.1.0 in the version that was released instead of
2.1.0-RC1? Though we now have the SVN Rev # in there, it could prove
confusing for anyone that holds on to it.
Cheers,
Brett
On 10/03/2009, at 3:00 AM, John Casey w
On 11/03/2009, at 10:24 PM, Mark Hobson wrote:
2009/3/11 Brett Porter :
It looks like this occurs when a password matches the definition of
an
encrpyted password (I believe anything wrapped in { ... }), and you
do not
have a master password configured. I'll improve the error message.
Did
2009/3/11 Brett Porter :
> It looks like this occurs when a password matches the definition of an
> encrpyted password (I believe anything wrapped in { ... }), and you do not
> have a master password configured. I'll improve the error message.
>
> Did you already have a password like this, or were
It looks like this occurs when a password matches the definition of an
encrpyted password (I believe anything wrapped in { ... }), and you do
not have a master password configured. I'll improve the error message.
Did you already have a password like this, or were you testing the
encrypted p
Just tried upgrading from 2.0.10 and get this:
[m...@mark]$ mvn clean install
[INFO]
[ERROR] FATAL ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO] Unable to configure Maven for exe
Seems to work fine for the JBoss app server :)
John Casey wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've rolled the first release candidate for Maven 2.1.0. It's available at:
http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-RC1
(https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-4e4fa48c70323f/org/apache/maven/apache-
or the good job!
Julien
- Message d'origine
De : John Casey
À : Maven Developers List
Envoyé le : Mardi, 10 Mars 2009, 17h15mn 49s
Objet : Re: Re : [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-RC1
Could you file that in JIRA, and I'll take a look? If possible, please include
the -e option so I ca
Hi John,
I've submitted MNG-4079. Tell me if you need additional informations.
Thanks for the good job!
Julien
- Message d'origine
De : John Casey
À : Maven Developers List
Envoyé le : Mardi, 10 Mars 2009, 17h15mn 49s
Objet : Re: Re : [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.1.0-RC1
Coul
Could you file that in JIRA, and I'll take a look? If possible, please
include the -e option so I can try to figure out where the different
traces are being produced...it *might* be difficult to trace.
-john
Julien HENRY wrote:
Works fine and quickly, but here is a small question. In case of
Works fine and quickly, but here is a small question. In case of error, is it
possible to avoid duplication of the error message?
Example:
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Compilation failure
Failure executing javac, but
Hi John,
here are my results:
- Cactus buils fine.
- Cargo builds fine.
- Felix builds fine.
Cheers, Petar.
2009/3/10 Paul
> Everything is working nicely with this rc at my shop (lots of projects,
> lots
> of plugins several being custom ones etc...).
>
> I do get warnings about non act
Working fine on our corporate builds (custom plugins & al).
Thanks,
Stéphane
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:00 PM, John Casey wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've rolled the first release candidate for Maven 2.1.0. It's available at:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-RC1
> (
> https://repository.apache.or
Everything is working nicely with this rc at my shop (lots of projects, lots
of plugins several being custom ones etc...).
I do get warnings about non activated profiles and the build is quicker,
especially regarding artifact download.
/Paul
And tapestry trunk is building nicely.
Christian.
Oh, MacBook Pro with 2G RAM, Java 1.5
On Mar 9, 2009, at 12:00 PM, John Casey wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've rolled the first release candidate for Maven 2.1.0. It's
available at:
http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-RC1
(https://repository.apache.or
WFM
I just built tapestry5.0.x branch, plus a bunch of my own projects.
It seems to work just fine. Only one problem, which I think is a
selenium-on-Mac issue, not a maven one. I kept having to manually
kill firefox before it could continue.
Christian
On Mar 10, 2009, at 8:47 AM, Fabr
Hi John,
everything's building fine here! Great :-)
- Fabrice
belling...@apache.org
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:00 PM, John Casey wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've rolled the first release candidate for Maven 2.1.0. It's available at:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-RC1
> (
> https://repositor
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:00 PM, John Casey wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've rolled the first release candidate for Maven 2.1.0. It's available at:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/maven-2-1-0-RC1
> (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-4e4fa48c70323f/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2
Now it passes and I didn't change my code :-(I have to test it a little bit
more to see if there's an issue or not.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
> Hi,
> I tried to build the maven-eclipse-plugin with its integration tests but it
> fails.I'm opening an issue
> Everythin
Hi,
I tried to build the maven-eclipse-plugin with its integration tests but it
fails.I'm opening an issue
Everything is building fine with 2.0.10
cheers
Arnaud
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:00 PM, John Casey wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've rolled the first release candidate for Maven 2.1.0. It's
I'm playing around with this a bit.It's definitely faster than 2.0.10 for
my "fastinstall" cases. From 36 seconds down to 27 seconds. That's good.
However, with "mvn clean", I'm getting a LOT of warning spit out:
NOTE: You may need to run this build to the 'compile' lifecycle phase,
28 matches
Mail list logo
