Re : Re : [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

2008-07-18 Thread Julien HENRY
Thanks John. I will try next RC and comment in Jira issue if there is still a problem. - Message d'origine De : John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À : Maven Developers List Envoyé le : Vendredi, 18 Juillet 2008, 17h18mn 53s Objet : Re: Re : [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

Re: Re : [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

2008-07-18 Thread John Casey
Okay, I've duplicated the problem, and generated a simple test case to replicate it separately from the JWebUnit project, so we can create an integration test. The JIRA issue is: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3671 I have a fix for this issue (I believe), but still need to formalize the

Re: Re : [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

2008-07-18 Thread John Casey
I'll give it a try today and see if I can reproduce the problem. Then, we should file a JIRA ticket so it shows up on the release notes, and I'll fix it. Thanks for testing! -john Julien HENRY wrote: Hi John, I can't manage to build JWebUnit anymore with 2.0.10-RC1. One of my module is dep

Re : [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

2008-07-18 Thread Julien HENRY
Hi John, I can't manage to build JWebUnit anymore with 2.0.10-RC1. One of my module is depending on the other one using this syntax: net.sourceforge.jwebunit jwebunit-webtestcase-generator ${pom.version}

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

2008-07-17 Thread John Casey
Found it and fixed it. Thanks for testing! Henrique Prange wrote: Hi John, I've tried Maven 2.0.10-RC1 with one of my projects and got a NullPointerException while resolving dependencies (below is the stack trace). It works using Maven 2.0.9. Should I file a bug on Jira with fix-for 2.0.10?

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

2008-07-17 Thread Henrique Prange
Hi John, I've tried Maven 2.0.10-RC1 with one of my projects and got a NullPointerException while resolving dependencies (below is the stack trace). It works using Maven 2.0.9. Should I file a bug on Jira with fix-for 2.0.10? Cheers, Henrique hprange:pas-human-resources-model hprange$ mvn

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

2008-07-17 Thread John Casey
too. I think for this purpose it's not needed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Benedict Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 8:18 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1 I do not think it's worth doin

RE: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

2008-07-16 Thread Brian E. Fox
lf Of Paul Benedict Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 8:18 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1 I do not think it's worth doing. RCs for Maven are not used like they are for at other projects, e.g., the Spring Framework. Spring uses each RC to apply about 10

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

2008-07-16 Thread Paul Benedict
at the > > >> end are complete and under a single version. > > >> > > >> -Original Message- > > >> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 9:11 AM > > >> To: Maven Developers List

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

2008-07-16 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
l-08, at 10:34 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote: > > > >> I would just continue to use 2.0.10, that way the release notes at the > >> end are complete and under a single version. > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

2008-07-16 Thread Samuel Le Berrigaud
ednesday, July 16, 2008 9:11 AM >> To: Maven Developers List >> Subject: Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1 >> >> John, maybe a new version in JIRA to help track issues/regressions for >> the RC cycle would help. Brian ended up doing 9 RCs so I'm sure we'll &

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

2008-07-16 Thread John Casey
This is fixed. I'm formalizing things and adding an integration test now. Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Done. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3667 cheers, arnaud On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 4:16 PM, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please file with fix-for of 2.0.10, with that test case if y

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

2008-07-16 Thread Brett Porter
Previously in wagon, the "transferError" event was used haphazardly (ie, not for all errors, inconsistently across providers, etc). It's use is now uniform. However, it is firing for all exceptions (including not found and authorization failures). On second thought that is probably not the

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

2008-07-16 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Done. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3667 cheers, arnaud On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 4:16 PM, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please file with fix-for of 2.0.10, with that test case if you have it. :-) > > Thanks, > > -john > > Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > >> With RC1, maven tries to down

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

2008-07-16 Thread Jason van Zyl
complete and under a single version. -Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 9:11 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1 John, maybe a new version in JIRA to help track issues/regressions for the RC cycle

RE: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

2008-07-16 Thread Brian E. Fox
I would just continue to use 2.0.10, that way the release notes at the end are complete and under a single version. -Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 9:11 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

2008-07-16 Thread John Casey
Please file with fix-for of 2.0.10, with that test case if you have it. :-) Thanks, -john Arnaud HERITIER wrote: With RC1, maven tries to download this dependency org/apache/ws/commons/XmlSchema/SNAPSHOT/XmlSchema-SNAPSHOT.jar whereas with 2.0.9 it retreives the version 1.1. What I have is a p

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

2008-07-16 Thread John Casey
Please file this with fix-for of 2.0.10. I'll take a look. -john nicolas de loof wrote: Running mvn eclipse:eclipse on my project dump many stacktrace on the console : Downloading: http://sai1rennes:/archiva/repository/releases/org/jmock/jmock/2.4.0/jmock-2.4.0-javadoc.jar org.apache.maven

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

2008-07-16 Thread John Casey
Hang on a second though; since we're attempting to release 2.0.10, why not file the issues under there? I think I'd rather see that happen, since then the final release notes for 2.0.10 will incorporate any issues we find along the way. -john Jason van Zyl wrote: John, maybe a new version in

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

2008-07-16 Thread John Casey
I'll set that up now. Jason van Zyl wrote: John, maybe a new version in JIRA to help track issues/regressions for the RC cycle would help. Brian ended up doing 9 RCs so I'm sure we'll get close to that again. Especially given what look like fundament problems with wagon/artifact resolution.

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

2008-07-16 Thread Jason van Zyl
John, maybe a new version in JIRA to help track issues/regressions for the RC cycle would help. Brian ended up doing 9 RCs so I'm sure we'll get close to that again. Especially given what look like fundament problems with wagon/artifact resolution. On 16-Jul-08, at 8:12 AM, nicolas de loof

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

2008-07-16 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
With RC1, maven tries to download this dependency org/apache/ws/commons/XmlSchema/SNAPSHOT/XmlSchema-SNAPSHOT.jar whereas with 2.0.9 it retreives the version 1.1. What I have is a project with a dependency to org.codehaus.xfire:xfire-core:1.2.6 In the xfire-core pom we have a dependency to org.apac

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

2008-07-16 Thread nicolas de loof
Running mvn eclipse:eclipse on my project dump many stacktrace on the console : Downloading: http://sai1rennes:/archiva/repository/releases/org/jmock/jmock/2.4.0/jmock-2.4.0-javadoc.jar org.apache.maven.wagon.ResourceDoesNotExistException: Unable to locate resource in repository at org

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

2008-07-15 Thread John Casey
Looks like the 1.1 version of the shade plugin didn't do what I needed it to WRT avoiding rewriting the Xpp3Dom and/or XmlSerializer classes. The IT for MNG-3503 is messed up in the RC1 build, so I'll be cutting an RC2 as soon as I can verify that 1.0 of the shade plugin works (this is what we