Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-10-04 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, Not sure it's a maven issue here. You can try changing the sax parser -Djavax.xml.parsers.SAXParserFactory=org.apache.xerces.jaxp.SAXParserFactoryImpl with a recent xerces version in your classpath (in your pom I mean) In the gwt plugin configuration use ...-Djavax.xml.parsers.SAXParserFacto

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-10-04 Thread Siarhei Dudzin
Just fyi, the change in classpah ordering actually helped me to find a conflict there. Been testing RC3 since its been out - all is good so far. Regards, Siarhei On Oct 4, 2010 3:01 PM, "Benjamin Bentmann" wrote: > Baptiste MATHUS wrote: > >> I'd like to use dependency:list to check ordering, but

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-10-04 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Baptiste MATHUS wrote: I'd like to use dependency:list to check ordering, but I remember (Arnaud's tweet, I'd say) reading that the dependency plugin output is not reliable yet with maven3 execution? Is it? Regardless of the Maven version, dependency:list cannot be used to check class path or

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-10-04 Thread Baptiste MATHUS
Hi, I just tested maven3 on a project I hadn't tried before and notice a build failure that doesn't happen with mvn2.2.1. It seems to be related to XML parser problem&GWTTestCase. I suspect it might be related to classpath ordering, though I remember this order must be guaranteed since 2.0.9. I'd

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-10-04 Thread Baptiste MATHUS
Well, I agree that it's basically not a maven specific issue, but the thing is the build is going completely fine with 2.2.1, but not with 3.0rc3, so I'm trying to understand where the difference lies. And for the record, yes, it's a xml parser problem (oracle xmlparserv2 gets in the way). I just

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-10-04 Thread Siarhei Dudzin
Just fyi, the change in classpah ordering actually helped me to find a conflict there. Been testing RC3 since its been out - all is good so far. Regards, Siarhei On Oct 4, 2010 3:01 PM, "Benjamin Bentmann" wrote:

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-10-02 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Robert Scholte wrote: [INFO] --- maven-gpg-plugin:1.1:sign (sign-artifacts) @ mojo-parent --- GPG Passphrase: * gpg: can't open `D:\java-workspace\helios\mojo-parent\target\mojo-parent-26-site.xml': No such file or directory gpg: signing failed: file open error This is neither

RE: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-10-02 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi Benjamin, I've tried to release the mojo-parent with Maven 3.0-RC3, but it failed: [INFO] --- maven-gpg-plugin:1.1:sign (sign-artifacts) @ mojo-parent --- GPG Passphrase: * gpg: can't open `D:\java-workspace\helios\mojo-parent\target\mojo-parent-26-site.xml': No such file or d

RE: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-09-26 Thread Ed Staub
] Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 5:34 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3 Updating the main page would require a formal vote on the dev list... IANAL but AFAIK these are not formal releases, but weakly release candidates and are not officially release

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-09-26 Thread Stephen Connolly
Updating the main page would require a formal vote on the dev list... IANAL but AFAIK these are not formal releases, but weakly release candidates and are not officially released by the apache foundation (because an official release would require a vote and only official releases can be linked fro

RE: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-09-26 Thread Ed Staub
Just my 2 cents, but I'd think it would be good to get the release candidates reviewed publicly. The main page (http://maven.apache.org) still is at beta-3. -Ed Staub -Original Message- From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu] Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 12:25 P