Thanks, I'll try it again.
If the setup can be on by default that would be much more helpful.
On Feb 10, 2014, at 7:38 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> the gist says: "See RAT report in:
> /Users/jvanzyl/js/tesla/maven/target/checkout/maven-core/target/rat.txt"
> And this file says:
>
> Unapproved li
the gist says: "See RAT report in:
/Users/jvanzyl/js/tesla/maven/target/checkout/maven-core/target/rat.txt"
And this file says:
Unapproved licenses:
src/site/xdoc/maven-deps.odg
So I simply exclude *.odg files and add a missing license header in an
other file: maven-core/src/main/java/org/apa
If you can wait til tomorrow I'll sort it out...
On Tuesday, 11 February 2014, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> So the current setup of the RAT plugin let me tag everything and then it
> blew up while trying to build the binaries for staging. Less than ideal,
> surprised me, and moderately annoying. It is
So the current setup of the RAT plugin let me tag everything and then it blew
up while trying to build the binaries for staging. Less than ideal, surprised
me, and moderately annoying. It is never a good idea to only execute something
during a release. Absolutely guaranteed to only blow while do
Here you go: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-145
For the record the maven-license-plugin works very well and can insert the
correct licenses as well.
On Jul 21, 2013, at 5:19 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 21 July 2013 21:23, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 21, 2013, at 3:14 PM, sebb wrot
On 21 July 2013 21:23, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> On Jul 21, 2013, at 3:14 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 21 July 2013 19:47, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 21, 2013, at 2:29 PM, Stephen Connolly
>>> wrote:
>>>
Revert my change upping to RAT 0.9
Stupid plugin has major regression in
On Jul 21, 2013, at 3:14 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 21 July 2013 19:47, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 21, 2013, at 2:29 PM, Stephen Connolly
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Revert my change upping to RAT 0.9
>>>
>>> Stupid plugin has major regression in performance, but 0.8 needs excludes
>>> for git
>>>
On 21 July 2013 19:47, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> On Jul 21, 2013, at 2:29 PM, Stephen Connolly
> wrote:
>
>> Revert my change upping to RAT 0.9
>>
>> Stupid plugin has major regression in performance, but 0.8 needs excludes
>> for git
>>
>
> Yup, just noticed that as well. After trying to attempt
On Jul 21, 2013, at 2:29 PM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> Revert my change upping to RAT 0.9
>
> Stupid plugin has major regression in performance, but 0.8 needs excludes
> for git
>
Yup, just noticed that as well. After trying to attempt to release my
distribution 4 times and the RAT plugin b
Revert my change upping to RAT 0.9
Stupid plugin has major regression in performance, but 0.8 needs excludes
for git
If I'd had notice I'd have reverted it my self but on a phone so no access
to revert it... Once they get a proper usable release we *should* be ok...
Though they don't seem to know
I just tried to cut a distribution using the existing Maven POM and it let me
get through the release:prepare phase without any issues and then failed during
the release:perform phase. I have no idea how RAT works, or who set it up but
that behavior is sub-optimal. Would probably be all right to
11 matches
Mail list logo
