I figured it out - I went back to v 1.4 of shade.
-Original Message-
From: Clark, Gil W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 8:53 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: RE: Question on building Maven 2.0.x
Sorry to be naïve but is the shade work going to replace
Sorry to be naïve but is the shade work going to replace the way the uber jar
was used?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 8:23 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Question on building Maven 2.0.x
On 18 Apr
On 18 Apr 07, at 10:55 AM 18 Apr 07, Clark, Gil W. wrote:
A couple weeks back I was successfully building Maven 2.0.x. The last
stage of the build is to run mvn assembly:assembly in the maven-core
directory. The resultant zip, gz, etc. contained the uberjar called
maven-2.0.x-uber.jar which
A couple weeks back I was successfully building Maven 2.0.x. The last
stage of the build is to run mvn assembly:assembly in the maven-core
directory. The resultant zip, gz, etc. contained the uberjar called
maven-2.0.x-uber.jar which goes in the lib directory. Unzip it
somewhere - everything
