Re: Pushing Maven 2.0.11

2009-11-21 Thread Brett Porter
On 21/11/2009, at 3:30 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote: > All joking aside, 2.0.9 and 2.0.10 have proven to be very stable. We need to > keep the same bar for 2.0.11 especially if we intend this to be the end of > 2.0.x. That means we need lots of participation during the rc process. Yep, there's no re

Re: Pushing Maven 2.0.11

2009-11-20 Thread Brian E. Fox
All joking aside, 2.0.9 and 2.0.10 have proven to be very stable. We need to keep the same bar for 2.0.11 especially if we intend this to be the end of 2.0.x. That means we need lots of participation during the rc process. --Brian (mobile) On Nov 20, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Brett Porter wrote:

Re: Pushing Maven 2.0.11

2009-11-20 Thread Stephen Connolly
2009/11/20 Brett Porter : > > On 21/11/2009, at 9:40 AM, Paul Gier wrote: > >>> Well, for 2.0.x, it is :) >>> - Brett >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@

Re: Pushing Maven 2.0.11

2009-11-20 Thread Brett Porter
On 21/11/2009, at 9:40 AM, Paul Gier wrote: >> Well, for 2.0.x, it is :) >> - Brett >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > There isn't a

Re: Pushing Maven 2.0.11

2009-11-20 Thread Paul Gier
Brett Porter wrote: On 21/11/2009, at 8:53 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Michael wrote: Brian Fox schrieb: oh wait oh wait, but i've got 15 things. Which are? He's kidding. :) It seems like every time someone tries to release something around here, there is a

Re: Pushing Maven 2.0.11

2009-11-20 Thread Brett Porter
On 21/11/2009, at 8:53 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Michael wrote: >> Brian Fox schrieb: >>> >>> oh wait oh wait, but i've got 15 things. >> >> Which are? > > He's kidding. :) It seems like every time someone tries to release > something around here, there is

Re: Pushing Maven 2.0.11

2009-11-20 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Michael wrote: > Brian Fox schrieb: >> >> oh wait oh wait, but i've got 15 things. > > Which are? He's kidding. :) It seems like every time someone tries to release something around here, there is a chorus of "but wait, one more thing!" as if it will be the l

Re: Pushing Maven 2.0.11

2009-11-20 Thread Michael
Brian Fox schrieb: oh wait oh wait, but i've got 15 things. Which are? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: Pushing Maven 2.0.11

2009-11-20 Thread Brian Fox
oh wait oh wait, but i've got 15 things. ;-) On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > Yes, it's been tagged a while too. I was planning to start the RC process > today. > > On 21/11/2009, at 8:04 AM, Michael wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> all issues for Maven 2.0.11 have been clo

Re: Pushing Maven 2.0.11

2009-11-20 Thread Brett Porter
Yes, it's been tagged a while too. I was planning to start the RC process today. On 21/11/2009, at 8:04 AM, Michael wrote: > Hi folks, > > all issues for Maven 2.0.11 have been closed since August [1]. > Why hasn't this relese been pushed so far? > > > Thanks, > > Mike > > [1] > http://jira

Pushing Maven 2.0.11

2009-11-20 Thread Michael
Hi folks, all issues for Maven 2.0.11 have been closed since August [1]. Why hasn't this relese been pushed so far? Thanks, Mike [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?sorter/field=updated&sorter/order=DESC --