Omission !
I will fix that.
Thanks for review and doc fix :-)
--
Olivier
Le 12 mai 2012 17:22, "Hervé BOUTEMY" a écrit :
> great! well done!
>
> working on documentation, I found something strange: @Component annotation
> doesn't provide readonly nor required attributes, that are available in
> M
great! well done!
working on documentation, I found something strange: @Component annotation
doesn't provide readonly nor required attributes, that are available in Mojo
Javadoc Tags. Is this expected or a simple omission?
Regards,
Hervé
Le samedi 12 mai 2012 12:30:31 Olivier Lamy a écrit :
>
so all done :-).
2012/5/12 Olivier Lamy :
> Update: help generation works now.
> I have created a branch of compiler plugin using annotations as a
> sample:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/branches/maven-compiler-plugin-annotations/
>
> Now my idea is to create a branch 2.x from
Update: help generation works now.
I have created a branch of compiler plugin using annotations as a
sample:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/branches/maven-compiler-plugin-annotations/
Now my idea is to create a branch 2.x from the current and merge the
branch in trunk.
2012/5/9
Thursday, May 10, 2012 9:34 PM
> Subject: Re: Plugins with Annotations ETA
>
> 2012/5/10 Jesse Glick :
>> On 05/09/2012 12:56 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>>
>>> we still need to do some javadoc parsing for @deprecated
>>
>>
>> Just look for @D
2012/5/10 Jesse Glick :
> On 05/09/2012 12:56 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>
>> we still need to do some javadoc parsing for @deprecated
>
>
> Just look for @Deprecated - the real annotation - instead. (Note that javac
> will warn you if you have the Javadoc tag without the annotation.)
>
>
>> @since a
On 05/09/2012 12:56 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
we still need to do some javadoc parsing for @deprecated
Just look for @Deprecated - the real annotation - instead. (Note that javac
will warn you if you have the Javadoc tag without the annotation.)
@since and comments for class/field description.
-
> From: Jason van Zyl
> To: Maven Developers List
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 1:15 AM
> Subject: Re: Plugins with Annotations ETA
>
>
> On May 9, 2012, at 3:30 PM, Mark Derricutt wrote:
>
>> On 10/05/12 7:47 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>> The
On May 9, 2012, at 3:30 PM, Mark Derricutt wrote:
> On 10/05/12 7:47 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>> The only thing I would like to sync up on is a couple changes I want to make
>> to the plugin manager to make sure the current plugin packaging, the plugin
>> packaging you're making and the plugin
2012/5/9 Jason van Zyl :
>
> On May 9, 2012, at 3:23 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
>> 2012/5/9 Jason van Zyl :
>>> The only thing I might suggest is that you create a hybrid scanner that can
>>> deal with the old and new. It looks like you've already looked at [1], but
>>> the hybrid scanner is here[
On May 9, 2012, at 3:23 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/5/9 Jason van Zyl :
>> The only thing I might suggest is that you create a hybrid scanner that can
>> deal with the old and new. It looks like you've already looked at [1], but
>> the hybrid scanner is here[2].
> Thanks but this mix scannin
And btw make changes you need. I have added some its for basic use
cases with annotations.
2012/5/9 Olivier Lamy :
> 2012/5/9 Jason van Zyl :
>> The only thing I might suggest is that you create a hybrid scanner that can
>> deal with the old and new. It looks like you've already looked at [1], bu
On 10/05/12 7:47 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
The only thing I would like to sync up on is a couple changes I want to make to
the plugin manager to make sure the current plugin packaging, the plugin
packaging you're making and the plugin packaging I'm working on in Tesla all
work together without
2012/5/9 Jason van Zyl :
> The only thing I might suggest is that you create a hybrid scanner that can
> deal with the old and new. It looks like you've already looked at [1], but
> the hybrid scanner is here[2].
Thanks but this mix scanning is already implemented in the branch.
Currently the onl
Its great to see this teamwork happening from the outside. Keep it up!
manfred
On Wed, May 9, 2012 12:47 pm, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> The only thing I might suggest is that you create a hybrid scanner that
> can deal with the old and new. It looks like you've already looked at [1],
> but the hybrid
The only thing I might suggest is that you create a hybrid scanner that can
deal with the old and new. It looks like you've already looked at [1], but the
hybrid scanner is here[2].
The only thing I would like to sync up on is a couple changes I want to make to
the plugin manager to make sure t
Hi,
So I have pushed some stuff on supporting plugin descriptor generation
from annotations as described here [1].
I have added support of having annotations from parent classes even if
they are not in the same project (from reactors and/or dependencies).
BTW we still need to do some javadoc parsin
17 matches
Mail list logo
