Re: Plugin execution ordering within a phase

2006-11-02 Thread Aaron . Digulla
> > There's just one problem - inheritance. Should plugins/executions > > defined > > in the parent be placed before or after the ones in the child pom? > > I'd say before, but maybe they need to be interleaved.. > > This is where an element makes a lot of sense. The order > doesn't have to be

Re: Plugin execution ordering within a phase

2006-11-01 Thread Brian Topping
On Nov 1, 2006, at 5:17 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 2 Nov 06, at 6:02 AM 2 Nov 06, Wendy Smoak wrote: How should I do this if I can't depend on execution order? Ultimately this should be setup in a custom lifecycle so that it becomes a recipe for using Selenium with Maven in addition to e

Re: Plugin execution ordering within a phase

2006-11-01 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 2 Nov 06, at 6:02 AM 2 Nov 06, Wendy Smoak wrote: On 10/31/06, Kenney Westerhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thinking about this, it may be a too harsh limitation of M2: plugins are meant to be independent of eachother, so you really shouldn't have to execute several plugins to achieve 1

Re: Plugin execution ordering within a phase

2006-11-01 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 10/31/06, Kenney Westerhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thinking about this, it may be a too harsh limitation of M2: plugins are meant to be independent of eachother, so you really shouldn't have to execute several plugins to achieve 1 task, or even set up something specific for another plugi

Re: Plugin execution ordering within a phase

2006-11-01 Thread Brian Topping
On Nov 1, 2006, at 1:03 AM, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Brian Topping wrote: There's just one problem - inheritance. Should plugins/executions defined in the parent be placed before or after the ones in the child pom? I'd say before, but maybe they need to be interleaved.. This is where an ele

MNG-2626 (was Re: Plugin execution ordering within a phase)

2006-11-01 Thread Brian Topping
On Nov 1, 2006, at 1:03 AM, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Brian Topping wrote: I hope that the patch for MNG-2626 can make it in for 2.0.5, it's a very simple test case that needs to be cooked for it (system scope dependency in parent POM) so I'll try to get that done today after all the other fi

Re: Plugin execution ordering within a phase

2006-11-01 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Hi, Comments inline. Brian Topping wrote: Hi Kenney, Thanks for your thoughts on this. I like most all these ideas. Comments inline. On Oct 31, 2006, at 12:25 AM, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Brian Topping wrote: Hi, there's a bug in maven 2.0.4 for the plugin ordering. It uses a Set. This i

Re: Plugin execution ordering within a phase

2006-10-31 Thread Brian Topping
Hi Kenney, Thanks for your thoughts on this. I like most all these ideas. Comments inline. On Oct 31, 2006, at 12:25 AM, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Brian Topping wrote: Hi, there's a bug in maven 2.0.4 for the plugin ordering. It uses a Set. This is fixed in SVN (LinkedHashSet that preserv

Re: Plugin execution ordering within a phase

2006-10-31 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Brian Topping wrote: Hi, there's a bug in maven 2.0.4 for the plugin ordering. It uses a Set. This is fixed in SVN (LinkedHashSet that preserves ordering), and will be available in 2.0.5 and 2.1. Thinking about this, it may be a too harsh limitation of M2: plugins are meant to be independent

Plugin execution ordering within a phase

2006-10-30 Thread Brian Topping
Greetings, I'm having a problem using assembly plugin to create a work directory for another plugin (the debian plugin). I started off by putting these plugins in different phases to force the order, but as the project has evolved, this has become unworkable because there are no open pha