On 14 Oct 06, at 12:30 PM 14 Oct 06, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Maven DOCCK plugin 1.0-beta-1 for Maven 2 has been released.
Please sync http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-
repository to the central Maven repository.
Ok, I will take care of this and turn on the work Hen and I did.
Maven DOCCK plugin 1.0-beta-1 for Maven 2 has been released.
Please sync http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository to
the central Maven repository.
--
Dennis Lundberg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
On 8/23/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 23 Aug 06, at 4:06 PM 23 Aug 06, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> A 'deploy' passes through the package and install phases, correct?
>
> We do *not* want the artifacts re-built, they've already been
> evaluated and voted on.
>
Sure, once using th
On 23 Aug 06, at 4:06 PM 23 Aug 06, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 8/23/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 23 Aug 06, at 3:59 PM 23 Aug 06, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> Would a "quick and dirty" fix be just to allow the deploy-to URL be
> overridden on the command line? That way we could
On 23 Aug 06, at 4:03 PM 23 Aug 06, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 8/23/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think here you could just use the release plugin instead of the
deploy. You would release:prepare to tag a release and then
release:perform to build and deploy it. If you do this to a
On 8/23/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 23 Aug 06, at 3:59 PM 23 Aug 06, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> Would a "quick and dirty" fix be just to allow the deploy-to URL be
> overridden on the command line? That way we could leave our POMs
> defaulting
> to the test builds repositor
On 8/23/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think here you could just use the release plugin instead of the
deploy. You would release:prepare to tag a release and then
release:perform to build and deploy it. If you do this to a staging
area you can still vote on it and move it somewhe
On 23 Aug 06, at 3:59 PM 23 Aug 06, Craig McClanahan wrote:
On 8/23/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/23/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you are building with m2 there is no reason for the metadata not
> to be there. If the release plugin was used then the met
On 8/23/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/23/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you are building with m2 there is no reason for the metadata not
> to be there. If the release plugin was used then the metadata would
> be there. How was this release made?
Shale and S
On 23 Aug 06, at 3:32 PM 23 Aug 06, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 8/23/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you are building with m2 there is no reason for the metadata not
to be there. If the release plugin was used then the metadata would
be there. How was this release made?
Shale and
On 8/23/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you are building with m2 there is no reason for the metadata not
to be there. If the release plugin was used then the metadata would
be there. How was this release made?
Shale and Struts both use a 'test build' stage where we tag and buil
On 23 Aug 06, at 2:40 PM 23 Aug 06, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 8/23/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Apache Shale committers have voted to release version 1.0.3.
Please
rsync the Apache repository (
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository) to the
public
M
On 8/23/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Apache Shale committers have voted to release version 1.0.3. Please
rsync the Apache repository (
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository) to the public
Maven repositories.
Craig, how did you deploy this? I don't s
The Apache Shale committers have voted to release version 1.0.3. Please
rsync the Apache repository (
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository) to the public
Maven repositories.
Craig
14 matches
Mail list logo
