On 3 Nov 06, at 9:48 PM 3 Nov 06, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I'm complaining because of this comment:
On 11/3/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I pulled Wicket out of the automated sync
If we were not auto-sync'd, then how could we be pulled out of it?
I should have qualified that
On 3 Nov 06, at 7:13 PM 3 Nov 06, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On 11/3/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I pulled Wicket out of the automated sync because it required Carlos'
password which means it can't be run by cron. If you want so sort
this out subscribe to the repository list: repos
Oh, and one last thing: I don't mind having to wait a couple of days
before a sync happens. That's all in the game for having a central
repository and you guys providing the gateway service for it.
I really appreciate the repo sync, it saves me (and you I suppose) a
lot of work.
Martijn
On 11/3
I'm complaining because of this comment:
On 11/3/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I pulled Wicket out of the automated sync
If we were not auto-sync'd, then how could we be pulled out of it? I
know we were not in auto-sync, so this came across on me that our
script was completely r
Martijn, it has never been automatically synced. Nothing has changed
for you, so I don't know why you are complaining.
I've synced it manually this time.
On 11/3/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/3/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I pulled Wicket out of the auto
On 11/3/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I pulled Wicket out of the automated sync because it required Carlos'
password which means it can't be run by cron. If you want so sort
this out subscribe to the repository list: repository-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nice to be notified of this at a
On 2 Nov 06, at 11:33 PM 2 Nov 06, Nathan Hamblen wrote:
And while someone's in there, could you also please sync with the
Databinder repository which has scripts in place?
http://databinder.net/maven/
It depends on Wicket 1.2.3. Thanks in advance!
If you take this:
http://svn.apach
On 2 Nov 06, at 11:33 PM 2 Nov 06, Nathan Hamblen wrote:
And while someone's in there, could you also please sync with the
Databinder repository which has scripts in place?
http://databinder.net/maven/
It depends on Wicket 1.2.3. Thanks in advance!
I pulled Wicket out of the automated
And while someone's in there, could you also please sync with the
Databinder repository which has scripts in place?
http://databinder.net/maven/
It depends on Wicket 1.2.3. Thanks in advance!
Nathan
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 20:57 +0100, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> Dear Maven guru's,
&
Dear Maven guru's,
could you please sync the wicket repository to Ibiblio. We've just
released Wicket 1.2.3 and are anxious to feed the maven 2 repository.
The scripts are already in place.
Thanks a million!
Martijn Dashorst
--
Download Wicket
On 10/27/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This should be automated now. Let us know if you don't see it in like 8 hours
Excellent, I didn't know. Syncing has already be done, thanks very much!
Jochen
--
My wife Mary and I have been married for forty-seven years and not
once have
On 27 Oct 06, at 3:57 AM 27 Oct 06, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
/www/people.apache.org/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/ws/jaxme
due to the release of JaxMe 0.5.2.
The syncing should now all be happening automatically. When did you
copy it over to the apache repo? I'll publish the locatio
This should be automated now. Let us know if you don't see it in like 8 hours
On 10/27/06, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
/www/people.apache.org/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/ws/jaxme
due to the release of JaxMe 0.5.2.
Thanks,
Jochen
--
My wife Mary and I have been marri
/www/people.apache.org/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/ws/jaxme
due to the release of JaxMe 0.5.2.
Thanks,
Jochen
--
My wife Mary and I have been married for forty-seven years and not
once have we had an argument serious enough to consider divorce;
murder, yes, but divorce, never.
(Jack
On 14 Oct 06, at 12:30 PM 14 Oct 06, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Maven DOCCK plugin 1.0-beta-1 for Maven 2 has been released.
Please sync http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-
repository to the central Maven repository.
Ok, I will take care of this and turn on the work Hen and I did
Maven DOCCK plugin 1.0-beta-1 for Maven 2 has been released.
Please sync http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository to
the central Maven repository.
--
Dennis Lundberg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
ote:
Okay, I've cleaned up the m2 sync repo. Please sync the m1 repo.
BTW - Maybe I'm just not getting it, but it seems very odd that I use
Maven 2 with a v4.0.0 POM and perform a deploy:deploy-file using
legacy style to the m1 sync repo, then do a manual upload of source
JARs to th
Okay, I've cleaned up the m2 sync repo. Please sync the m1 repo.
BTW - Maybe I'm just not getting it, but it seems very odd that I use
Maven 2 with a v4.0.0 POM and perform a deploy:deploy-file using
legacy style to the m1 sync repo, then do a manual upload of source
JARs to the m1
That's other story and we can solve it if you provide the right
metadata in http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV
On 10/7/06, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Even though I was able to update and correct the artifact's
maven-metadata.xml (plus correct checksums)[1]? It would be nice to at
l
Even though I was able to update and correct the artifact's
maven-metadata.xml (plus correct checksums)[1]? It would be nice to at
least have this correct, so that the release version points to the
latest version, rather than the oldest.
-Nathan
[1] http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/xerces/xercesImp
Remove the one in the m2-ibiblio-sync directory
On 10/7/06, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I deployed Xerces to m2 and then did a legacy deploy to m1. Should I
clear out the legacy deploy?
Thanks,
-Nathan
On 10/6/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sorry, I forgot, if you
I deployed Xerces to m2 and then did a legacy deploy to m1. Should I
clear out the legacy deploy?
Thanks,
-Nathan
On 10/6/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sorry, I forgot, if you build with ant you deploy to the m1 repo. The
m2 is only for m2 builds because it's more accurate and h
why would ever the jars differ?
remove the sutff in m2, it hasn't been synced to ibiblio
On 10/7/06, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> sorry, I forgot, if you build with ant you deploy to the m1 repo. The
> m2 is only for m2 builds because it's more accurate and h
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> sorry, I forgot, if you build with ant you deploy to the m1 repo. The
> m2 is only for m2 builds because it's more accurate and has some
> metadata.
>
> Files deployed to any of the repos will be available to both m1 and m2
> users, so just deploy to one of them.
Yes, but
sorry, I forgot, if you build with ant you deploy to the m1 repo. The
m2 is only for m2 builds because it's more accurate and has some
metadata.
Files deployed to any of the repos will be available to both m1 and m2
users, so just deploy to one of them.
On 10/6/06, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Nathan Beyer wrote:
> Xerces doesn't build with either Maven 1 or Maven 2; everything is
> built with a custom Ant script. I created a custom POM and deployed
> using deploy:deploy-file for the binary and source JAR to m2 and then
> to m1 by setting the repo type to legacy.
>
> I essentially dupl
Xerces doesn't build with either Maven 1 or Maven 2; everything is
built with a custom Ant script. I created a custom POM and deployed
using deploy:deploy-file for the binary and source JAR to m2 and then
to m1 by setting the repo type to legacy.
I essentially duplicated what exists for Xerces 2.
you shouldn't deploy to both places. Deploy to m2 only if you build with m2.
On 10/6/06, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've deployed the latest Xerces release, v2.8.1 to the m1 and m2 sync
folders. Please run the rsync when you can.
Thanks,
-Nathan
--
I could give you my word
I've deployed the latest Xerces release, v2.8.1 to the m1 and m2 sync
folders. Please run the rsync when you can.
Thanks,
-Nathan
Hello, I have successfully released
native-maven-plugin-1.0-alpha-2yesterday at MOJO, please sync this
plugin
and its components to repo1.maven.org
Thanks
-Dan
done
On 10/4/06, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... the directory
/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/ws/commons/axiom
due to the release of Axiom 1.1.1.
Thanks,
Jochen
-
To uns
... the directory
/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/ws/commons/axiom
due to the release of Axiom 1.1.1.
Thanks,
Jochen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e
done
On 10/3/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hiya,
Last I checked the repo still had to be sync'd with Codehaus by hand.
Could someone please do this? Thanks,
- Dan
--
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com
http://netzooid.com/blog
--
Hiya,
Last I checked the repo still had to be sync'd with Codehaus by hand.
Could someone please do this? Thanks,
- Dan
--
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com
http://netzooid.com/blog
-
To unsubscribe, e-
done
On 9/20/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/18/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MyFaces Core 1.1.4 has been deployed to m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository.
> Please sync it to the central Maven repo when you have a chance.
>
> Vote thread:
htt
On 9/18/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MyFaces Core 1.1.4 has been deployed to m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository.
Please sync it to the central Maven repo when you have a chance.
Vote thread:
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-MyFaces-Core-1.1.4-t2253192.html
Carlos? I though
MyFaces Core 1.1.4 has been deployed to m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository.
Please sync it to the central Maven repo when you have a chance.
Vote thread:
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-MyFaces-Core-1.1.4-t2253192.html
Thanks,
Wendy Smoak
done
On 9/16/06, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... the directory
/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-repository/org/apache/ws/commons/axiom
due to the release of Axiom 1.1.
Thanks,
Jochen
--
My wife Mary and I have been married for forty-seven years and not
once have we had a
... the directory
/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-repository/org/apache/ws/commons/axiom
due to the release of Axiom 1.1.
Thanks,
Jochen
--
My wife Mary and I have been married for forty-seven years and not
once have we had an argument serious enough to consider divorce;
murder, yes, bu
nothing new there, probably already synced
On 8/31/06, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
/www/people.apache.org/www/m2-ibiblio-repository/org/apache/xmlrpc
Thank you!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
/www/people.apache.org/www/m2-ibiblio-repository/org/apache/xmlrpc
Thank you!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/23/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 23 Aug 06, at 4:06 PM 23 Aug 06, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> A 'deploy' passes through the package and install phases, correct?
>
> We do *not* want the artifacts re-built, they've already been
> evaluated and voted on.
>
Sure, once using th
On 23 Aug 06, at 4:06 PM 23 Aug 06, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 8/23/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 23 Aug 06, at 3:59 PM 23 Aug 06, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> Would a "quick and dirty" fix be just to allow the deploy-to URL be
> overridden on the command line? That way we could
On 23 Aug 06, at 4:03 PM 23 Aug 06, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 8/23/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think here you could just use the release plugin instead of the
deploy. You would release:prepare to tag a release and then
release:perform to build and deploy it. If you do this to a
On 8/23/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 23 Aug 06, at 3:59 PM 23 Aug 06, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> Would a "quick and dirty" fix be just to allow the deploy-to URL be
> overridden on the command line? That way we could leave our POMs
> defaulting
> to the test builds repositor
On 8/23/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think here you could just use the release plugin instead of the
deploy. You would release:prepare to tag a release and then
release:perform to build and deploy it. If you do this to a staging
area you can still vote on it and move it somewhe
On 23 Aug 06, at 3:59 PM 23 Aug 06, Craig McClanahan wrote:
On 8/23/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/23/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you are building with m2 there is no reason for the metadata not
> to be there. If the release plugin was used then the met
On 8/23/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/23/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you are building with m2 there is no reason for the metadata not
> to be there. If the release plugin was used then the metadata would
> be there. How was this release made?
Shale and S
On 23 Aug 06, at 3:32 PM 23 Aug 06, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 8/23/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you are building with m2 there is no reason for the metadata not
to be there. If the release plugin was used then the metadata would
be there. How was this release made?
Shale and
On 8/23/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you are building with m2 there is no reason for the metadata not
to be there. If the release plugin was used then the metadata would
be there. How was this release made?
Shale and Struts both use a 'test build' stage where we tag and buil
On 23 Aug 06, at 2:40 PM 23 Aug 06, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 8/23/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Apache Shale committers have voted to release version 1.0.3.
Please
rsync the Apache repository (
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository) to the
public
M
On 8/23/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Apache Shale committers have voted to release version 1.0.3. Please
rsync the Apache repository (
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository) to the public
Maven repositories.
Craig, how did you deploy this? I don't s
The Apache Shale committers have voted to release version 1.0.3. Please
rsync the Apache repository (
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository) to the public
Maven repositories.
Craig
On 8/16/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do I need to do this for Tapestry as well? I was under the impression
scripts came along and did it magically for me.
As I understand it, the Maven 2 ibiblio rsync repository does not get
synced automatically. (There is a README file at the
done
On 8/17/06, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the directory
/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/axis2
Thanks!
--
My wife Mary and I have been married for forty-seven years and not
once have we had an argument serious enough to consider divorce;
mur
the directory
/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/axis2
Thanks!
--
My wife Mary and I have been married for forty-seven years and not
once have we had an argument serious enough to consider divorce;
murder, yes, but divorce, never.
(Jack Benny)
--
Do I need to do this for Tapestry as well? I was under the impression
scripts came along and did it magically for me.
On 8/16/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please sync repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/struts with
ibiblio.
Struts 1.3.5 Beta has been deploye
Please sync repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/struts with ibiblio.
Struts 1.3.5 Beta has been deployed with signatures.
Release vote:
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Struts-1.3.5-Quality-%28re-vote%29-t2057958.html
Thanks,
Wendy Smoak
On 6/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please note that you should not deploy the files into
http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/ if you do deploy to
http://www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository
It's not needed and may add confusion, also because they are under
different gr
Please note that you should not deploy the files into
http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/ if you do deploy to
http://www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository
It's not needed and may add confusion, also because they are under
different groupIds.
On 6/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
done
On 6/24/06, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... the directory /www/www.apache.org/maven-repository/org/apache/xmlrpc,
due to the release of Apache XML-RPC 3.0b1.
Thanks,
Jochen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM
... the directory /www/www.apache.org/maven-repository/org/apache/xmlrpc,
due to the release of Apache XML-RPC 3.0b1.
Thanks,
Jochen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
done
On 6/19/06, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the following directories on people.apache.org:
/www/www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/org/apache/ws/commons/ws-commons-java5/
/www/www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/org/apache/ws/commons/ws-commons-util/
Thank you,
Jochen
the following directories on people.apache.org:
/www/www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/org/apache/ws/commons/ws-commons-java5/
/www/www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/org/apache/ws/commons/ws-commons-util/
Thank you,
Jochen
--
t; Torsten
>
> On 6/13/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > done
> >
> > On 6/11/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I've just deployed Lucene Core 1.9.1 and 2.0.0 to the ASF M2 repo:
> > >
> > > http://w
per <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've just deployed Lucene Core 1.9.1 and 2.0.0 to the ASF M2 repo:
> >
> > http://www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/org/apache/lucene/lucene-core/
> >
> > Please sync to ibiblio. TIA.
> >
> > --
> > Ma
0 to the ASF M2 repo:
>
> http://www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/org/apache/lucene/lucene-core/
>
> Please sync to ibiblio. TIA.
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards
done
On 6/11/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've just deployed Lucene Core 1.9.1 and 2.0.0 to the ASF M2 repo:
http://www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/org/apache/lucene/lucene-core/
Please sync to ibiblio. TIA.
--
Martin Cooper
--
I could give you my word as
I've just deployed Lucene Core 1.9.1 and 2.0.0 to the ASF M2 repo:
http://www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/org/apache/lucene/lucene-core/
Please sync to ibiblio. TIA.
--
Martin Cooper
done, will be there in some hours
On 5/30/06, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... the directory
/www/www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/org/apache/ws/commons to
Ibiblio, if this still needs manual work. If not, please let me know, so
that I'll stop such nagging in the future. :-)
... the directory
/www/www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/org/apache/ws/commons to
Ibiblio, if this still needs manual work. If not, please let me know, so
that I'll stop such nagging in the future. :-)
Jochen
-
To unsubscrib
I forgot to mention that I did this yesterday.
Wendy Smoak wrote:
Assuming everything looks okay, please sync
dist/maven-repository/org/apache/struts/struts-parent with ibiblio.
The struts-parent pom v2 has been deployed with a signature.
Release vote:
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE-Release-the
Assuming everything looks okay, please sync
dist/maven-repository/org/apache/struts/struts-parent with ibiblio.
The struts-parent pom v2 has been deployed with a signature.
Release vote:
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE-Release-the-struts-parent-pom-v2-t1554416.html
Thanks,
Wendy Smoak
(Apache
done
On 2/17/06, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ... on /www/www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository, due to releases of
> Apache XML-RPC, and the Maven JaxMe plugin.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jochen
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e
... on /www/www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository, due to releases of
Apache XML-RPC, and the Maven JaxMe plugin.
Regards,
Jochen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Done!
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>
> ... the directory
>
> org/apache/ws/jaxme/maven-jaxme-plugin
>
> on people.apache.org, /www/www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository to
> ibiblio. I am sorry, that this is required again, but a user has pointed
> out, that the previous distribution files have be
... the directory
org/apache/ws/jaxme/maven-jaxme-plugin
on people.apache.org, /www/www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository to
ibiblio. I am sorry, that this is required again, but a user has pointed
out, that the previous distribution files have been compiled with Java
5, thus have to be r
done!
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>
> ... group on people.apache.org,
> /www/www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository, to ibiblio.
>
> Reason: Release of JaxMe 0.5.1
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Jochen
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
... group on people.apache.org,
/www/www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository, to ibiblio.
Reason: Release of JaxMe 0.5.1
Regards,
Jochen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
Done.
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>
> ... on /www/www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jochen
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
... on /www/www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository.
Thanks,
Jochen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
81 matches
Mail list logo
