berndq wrote:
Edwin Punzalan wrote:
A staging site is currently available at
http://people.apache.org/~epunzalan/maven-assembly-plugin.
Thank you for taking some time to review it.
- Binding to package phase:
in the example there is packaging
Works for me only with package
Nice catch
Edwin Punzalan wrote:
A staging site is currently available at
http://people.apache.org/~epunzalan/maven-assembly-plugin.
Thank you for taking some time to review it.
- Binding to package phase:
in the example there is packaging
Works for me only with package
- the page mentions "attac
Fixed and uploaded.
Sorry about that, I had to edit your patch for consistency.
Barrie Treloar wrote:
On 7/31/06, Edwin Punzalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
staging site updated with a patch from MASSEMBLY-130 applied.
Did I stuff up the patch?
*
http://people.apache.org/~epunzalan/maven-a
On 7/31/06, Edwin Punzalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
staging site updated with a patch from MASSEMBLY-130 applied.
Did I stuff up the patch?
* http://people.apache.org/~epunzalan/maven-assembly-plugin/examples/index.html
is missing a link to the include-and-exclude.html (It is included in
the
staging site updated with a patch from MASSEMBLY-130 applied.
Again, thanks for the reviewers. ^_^
Edwin Punzalan wrote:
Hi,
I've made some changes to the documentation of the Assembly plugin and
would like to hear your inputs about it.
- made the plugin docck-compliant
- edited the de
Hi,
Thanks for the review. Please see my inline comments below...
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi Edwin
I have committed a fix for a few typos.
Here are some additional comments om the assembly plugin documentation:
assembly-mojo.html
- archiverManager, artifactResolver and repositoryAssembler h
Any chance i can get MASSEMBLY-118, 119, 130 looked at the same time?
130 is a doc patch
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Edwin Punzalan wrote:
Hi,
I've made some changes to the documentation of the Assembly plugin and
would like to hear your inputs about it.
- made the plugin docck-compliant
- edited the descriptions inside the modello files
- edited some of the parameter descriptions
- added an faq page
Changes applied and deployed in the same staging site.
- fixed "simple" links to "single"
- added an faq on using javadoc to jar javadoc files docs
- added goals in the navigation bar
- added link to the project summary page in features.html
- fixed some typos and grammatical errors
- removed "A
http://people.apache.org/~epunzalan/maven-assembly-plugin/index.html:
* tar.bz -> tar.gz
* tar.gz2 -> tar.bz2
http://people.apache.org/~epunzalan/maven-assembly-plugin/descriptor-refs.html
In the 'src' section there is a sentence which starts with "The bin
descriptorId produces" which should be
Hi Edwin,
Great job! Thanks.
Here my comments:
Navbar:
Missing goals link to be in line with the standard
As already said, review links.
index.html
Missing usage part as usual.
features.html
What is the current version? Maybe add a link to /project-summary.html
faq.html
"is ran" => is run
e
unzalan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mercredi 26 juillet 2006 13:34
À : Maven Developers List
Objet : Please review maven-assembly-plugin site documentation
Hi,
I've made some changes to the documentation of the Assembly plugin and would
like to hear your inputs about it.
- m
when you clink on "Using repositories" in navigation bar, you don't
get any page. There is a typo in the path, it's using "single" instead
of "simple" or vice versa..
Milos
On 7/26/06, Edwin Punzalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've made some changes to the documentation of the Assembly pl
Hi,
I've made some changes to the documentation of the Assembly plugin and
would like to hear your inputs about it.
- made the plugin docck-compliant
- edited the descriptions inside the modello files
- edited some of the parameter descriptions
- added an faq page
- added some single pro
14 matches
Mail list logo
