: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Please raise MJAR-39 priority
Brett Porter wrote:
> I have 1 and 4 covered. Any volunteers for JAR?
I already have a patch for MJAR-38. I am ready to do more work, if
someone volunteers to work with me and pull the patches in.
Brett Porter wrote:
> I have 1 and 4 covered. Any volunteers for JAR?
I already have a patch for MJAR-38. I am ready to do more work, if
someone volunteers to work with me and pull the patches in.
Jochen
-
To unsubscribe, e
For EJB I just need to fix a couple of easy things and I'll request a
vote early next week.
Sorry, don't have much time right now for JAR. But please, take
MANIFEST.MF generation problems into consideration.
Thanks,
Stéphane
On 6/1/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's what I unde
Here's what I understand the current plugin lovin' pecking order to be:
- WAR (I have a release voted on here, just need to DO IT)
- EJB (Carlos, Stephane and Kenney have stepped up)
- JAR (Lots 'o' patches)
- SUREFIRE (a few high priority issues raised recently that need review)
I have 1 and 4 c
Hi,
may I kindly request that the priority of
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAR-39
should be raised? That bug caused that I have uploaded invalid jar files
to ibiblio. I need to recreate two releases.
Additionally I'd like to hint that the patches I suggested for MJAR-38
would at least
