On Friday 11 June 2010 1:40:07 pm Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
> Interesting info, and good numbers! Weave is a double edged sword;
> while it may be promising even
> faster builds, by design it has this irritating tendency to run mojos
> (of the same execution in different modules)
> *exactly* in par
Interesting info, and good numbers! Weave is a double edged sword;
while it may be promising even
faster builds, by design it has this irritating tendency to run mojos
(of the same execution in different modules)
*exactly* in parallel, more or less simulating how I'd write a unit
test to test threa
Well, weave mode doesn't work for CXF. Ends up with a NullPointerException
down in antrun-plugin someplace. Thus, I cannot help you there.
For CXF on my i7 820QM (4 cores, 8 threads) turning off checkstyle/pmd and
having everything already code generated/compiled (so mostly just running
I am picking up some positive tweets here and there, but I'd be really
happy if those of you who test parallel building could report back with
some numbers in response to this message. I am particularly interested
in the difference between parallel and weave (and linear too), mostly to
assess that
