Likewise, you can drop a testng dependency in and have it run your junit 3.8
tests in parallel. I remember testing this very early on in the testng/surefire
support.
I'd rather we didn't duplicate the parallel execution capabilities that are
already present in the various testing libraries.
On
If you are running java5 or higher, there's a good chance you can just
drop in surefire2.5 and junit-4.8.1, without making any code changes at
all. Although I haven't tested this specifically, I think it should
work.
You can read about how to do it here - I'll try to get parts of it into
some offi
Thanks for your prompt response.
We are using junit 3.8 unfortunately. We will look at upgrading
version but this patch will work with no upgrades to junit.
On 1/15/10, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> Eh Surefire 2.5 (which is in the process of being released)
> supports the parallel execution fea
Eh Surefire 2.5 (which is in the process of being released)
supports the parallel execution features of JUnit 4.7+
If that works for you, no patch required
-Stephen
2010/1/15 Colm O'Donnell :
> Hi,
>
> I work for a company that have a large number of junit tests. We have
> migrated from ant
Hi,
I work for a company that have a large number of junit tests. We have
migrated from ant to maven recently but are faced with a serious problem
with respect to the time to execute the tests. We used to execute some tests
in parallel with ant but it was not great and depended on a lot of manual
