Le mercredi 27 juillet 2011, Tim O'Brien a écrit :
> Vincent that seems like a mistake. Why add more specific elements like
> Wiki and API. Why make the POM syntax this specific. Why not make it
> free from, something like:
>
>
>
>
>
> Which you could compact down in some groovy syntax t
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Tim O'Brien wrote:
> Vincent that seems like a mistake. Why add more specific elements like
> Wiki
> and API. Why make the POM syntax this specific. Why not make it free
> from, something like:
>
>
>
>
>
> Which you could compact down in some groovy syntax
Vincent that seems like a mistake. Why add more specific elements like Wiki
and API. Why make the POM syntax this specific. Why not make it free
from, something like:
Which you could compact down in some groovy syntax to something like
"wiki:"
I see a lot of people using Maven for proje
Folks,
A general theme of these comments is, 'and what are we going to put in
our new pom version?'
I didn't go there in my writeup, since I was concerned with the
mechanics of 'how do we have a new POM *at all*'. But I see the point;
we can't make a new pom model every week, so we need to combin
Nice work. I somehow think that the starting point for this disucssion
should be the intended functionality of such a change; so I'd like to
start the discussion with the use cases.
One very simple use case which I personally would appreciate is more
compact pom format; "less bloat". I could see
Thx for your work Benson
I'll read and comment your document ASAP
About new elements we already discussed to add there was the
project/build/encoding
It may me think that we need to define about the compatibility management
we'll have to setup for plugins
For now we can say that a plugin works only
losed company firewall is still able to build in compat mode.
Maybe he is not able to build the latest and greatest pom5 project, but thats
not our fault then.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 7/27/11, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> From: Vincent Siveton
> Subject: Re: POM5 proposal
> To: "Ma
Hi Benson
Thanks for your proposal!
IMHO the pom5 should include some tags like or
and the javadoc
see MPIR-149 MJAVADOC-32
Cheers,
Vincent
2011/7/24 Benson Margulies :
> Since I can't edit the Wiki, I created:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k3E4vx_4cKJ4zzksVM4oROX3Dffsh0Q4VOGVjd3o
maven.mdo**
maven
Maven
elp in giving me edit access, and I
>>> don't think that any help has been forthcoming so far.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>> sorry, have no google account (and refuse to create one).
>>>> Cant you just pa
access, and I
>> don't think that any help has been forthcoming so far.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>> sorry, have no google account (and refuse to create one).
>>> Cant you just paste it into our Wiki?
>>>
>>>
refuse to create one).
>> Cant you just paste it into our Wiki?
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>> --- On Wed, 7/27/11, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>>> From: Benson Margulies
>>> Subject: Re: POM5 proposal
>>> To: "Maven Develo
unt (and refuse to create one).
> Cant you just paste it into our Wiki?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Wed, 7/27/11, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> From: Benson Margulies
>> Subject: Re: POM5 proposal
>> To: "Maven Developers List"
>> Date: We
sorry, have no google account (and refuse to create one).
Cant you just paste it into our Wiki?
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 7/27/11, Benson Margulies wrote:
> From: Benson Margulies
> Subject: Re: POM5 proposal
> To: "Maven Developers List"
> Date: Wednesday, July 27,
Ping? anybody read this?
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Since I can't edit the Wiki, I created:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k3E4vx_4cKJ4zzksVM4oROX3Dffsh0Q4VOGVjd3oUto/edit?hl=en_US
>
-
To
Since I can't edit the Wiki, I created:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k3E4vx_4cKJ4zzksVM4oROX3Dffsh0Q4VOGVjd3oUto/edit?hl=en_US
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev
16 matches
Mail list logo
