Sound good for me.
Vincent
2005/7/15, Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2005/7/15, Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 01:38:19PM -0400, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I noticed that the dependency.url tag has been removed from the POM v4.
> > > htt
2005/7/15, Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 01:38:19PM -0400, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed that the dependency.url tag has been removed from the POM v4.
> > http://maven.apache.org/maven2/maven-model/maven.html#class_Dependency
> >
> > I think the u
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 19:52 +0200, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 01:38:19PM -0400, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed that the dependency.url tag has been removed from the POM v4.
> > http://maven.apache.org/maven2/maven-model/maven.html#class_Dependency
> >
> > I
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 01:38:19PM -0400, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that the dependency.url tag has been removed from the POM v4.
> http://maven.apache.org/maven2/maven-model/maven.html#class_Dependency
>
> I think the url tag is very useful for reports. For instance: lets
> chec
Hi,
I noticed that the dependency.url tag has been removed from the POM v4.
http://maven.apache.org/maven2/maven-model/maven.html#class_Dependency
I think the url tag is very useful for reports. For instance: lets
check the following m1 report:
http://maven.apache.org/dependencies.html.
Though
