I created MNG-4452 to track this issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4452
Paul
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Dan Tran wrote:
> Just read my own post again,
>
>> For my case, we might be able to go forward with maven 3 ..
>
> should be
>
> For my case, we might NOT be able to go fo
This use case currently isn't covered, you're right and it's really
the only reason anymore to use non unique snapshots. Bringing this
over to @dev to figure out what to do.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> I did read the link. I thought Jason was saying Maven's metadata is
