Commit
Then
Review
On 16 July 2013 00:15, Barrie Treloar wrote:
> On 16 July 2013 08:39, Stephen Connolly
> wrote:
>> Remember folks, we are CTR not RTC so we shouldn't be holding up getting
>> stuff done
>
> I think I should be able to grok that, but google isn't helping me.
> Are you making u
On 16 July 2013 08:39, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> Remember folks, we are CTR not RTC so we shouldn't be holding up getting
> stuff done
I think I should be able to grok that, but google isn't helping me.
Are you making up your own acronyms :)
--
Remember folks, we are CTR not RTC so we shouldn't be holding up getting
stuff done
On Monday, 15 July 2013, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
> I think we won't debate a lot :-)
> Pushed
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY
>
> >wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Hervé
> >
> > Le l
I think we won't debate a lot :-)
Pushed
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le lundi 15 juillet 2013 21:02:37 Arnaud Héritier a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Now that 3.1 is out we'll have to think to the future.
> > I saw on twitter that Jas
+1
Regards,
Hervé
Le lundi 15 juillet 2013 21:02:37 Arnaud Héritier a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Now that 3.1 is out we'll have to think to the future.
> I saw on twitter that Jason has already many ideas to share.
> For now the version in master is 3.1-SNAPSHOT.
> Do we bump it to 3.2-SNAPS
Hi all,
Now that 3.1 is out we'll have to think to the future.
I saw on twitter that Jason has already many ideas to share.
For now the version in master is 3.1-SNAPSHOT.
Do we bump it to 3.2-SNAPSHOT ?
(We can always create a 3.1.x branch later from the tag if we need some
bugfix releas
