It might be clearer to annotate the diagram, rather than have a
separate key table.
On 3 January 2014 14:41, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> Just in case it wasn't clear... I'm looking for comments and feedback
>
>
> On 3 January 2014 14:35, Stephen Connolly
> wrote:
>
>> OK, so to start working on new
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Tutorial%3A+Maven+in+60+seconds
Still think that it is overly vague.
It would be easier to understand if the passive voice was eliminated.
Makes it clearer to understand what the developer has to do and what
maven is going to do while processing
Also, in case it is not clear, my preferred style is to tell you
information that is important later without distracting you by that
information
A case in point is the information that
> The list of modules in the reactor is sorted in order to ensure that any
dependencies that will be created by
FYI here is my current plan for content:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/New+Main+Site
On 3 January 2014 16:27, Ron Wheeler wrote:
> I agree with Robert's comment.
> There is a danger that the page will become architecturally elegant and
> will correctly describe all of the p
On 3 January 2014 16:09, Robert Scholte wrote:
> Op Fri, 03 Jan 2014 16:46:33 +0100 schreef Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com>:
>
>
> On 3 January 2014 15:17, Robert Scholte wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I like the idea of images, however I would avoid a graph to make
>>> somethi
Op Fri, 03 Jan 2014 16:46:33 +0100 schreef Stephen Connolly
:
On 3 January 2014 15:17, Robert Scholte wrote:
Hi,
I like the idea of images, however I would avoid a graph to make
something
clear for new Maven users.
Instead I'd prefer a linear model.
My first draft did not have the gr
On 3 January 2014 15:17, Robert Scholte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I like the idea of images, however I would avoid a graph to make something
> clear for new Maven users.
> Instead I'd prefer a linear model.
>
My first draft did not have the graph at the top... perhaps it would be
better suited at the bot
Hi,
I like the idea of images, however I would avoid a graph to make something
clear for new Maven users.
Instead I'd prefer a linear model.
I think you should split the current model into pieces:
A project model contains:
- dependencies
- a build plan
- other project models ( you can call t
Just in case it wasn't clear... I'm looking for comments and feedback
On 3 January 2014 14:35, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> OK, so to start working on new content I created some pages on the wiki:
>
> The first page is a 60 seconds overview of Maven's build process
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/co
OK, so to start working on new content I created some pages on the wiki:
The first page is a 60 seconds overview of Maven's build process
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Tutorial:+Maven+in+60+seconds
I am using icons because I want to have subsequent pages give more detail
and
10 matches
Mail list logo
