Fixed in the latest snapshot (now deployed). Note that you'll now get
prompted for the "version" and "package" values, though they have the
same defaults as before so you can just enter past them.
Cheers,
Brett
On 13/02/2008, at 2:02 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
The new archetype plugin seems t
On 13/02/2008, at 2:30 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
At any rate, we can fix that goal and mimic the new behavior. Might
be good to try and raise these things when we've asked repeatedly
for people to try it.
erm, I raised it early on, I raised it again when the alpha was
suggested, and I p
On 12-Feb-08, at 1:19 PM, Milos Kleint wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008 9:53 PM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12-Feb-08, at 11:39 AM, Milos Kleint wrote:
anyway,
I fixed both my and Daniels problem here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=627055
Great. Hardly tragic. Pr
On Feb 12, 2008 9:53 PM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 12-Feb-08, at 11:39 AM, Milos Kleint wrote:
>
> > anyway,
> >
> > I fixed both my and Daniels problem here:
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=627055
> >
>
> Great. Hardly tragic. Probably took you less time to
On 12-Feb-08, at 11:39 AM, Milos Kleint wrote:
anyway,
I fixed both my and Daniels problem here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=627055
Great. Hardly tragic. Probably took you less time to patch it then
write the email.
I also didn't figure that embedding Archetype in net
anyway,
I fixed both my and Daniels problem here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=627055
Milos
On Feb 12, 2008 7:52 PM, Milos Kleint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2008 6:45 PM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 12-Feb-08, at 8:16 AM, Milos Kleint wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008 6:45 PM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 12-Feb-08, at 8:16 AM, Milos Kleint wrote:
>
> > Jason,
> >
> > this is not about mimicking old behaviour. The new code is plain wrong
> > for this case.
>
> Mimicking the behavior means making it work like the previous versio
Jason,
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On 12-Feb-08, at 8:16 AM, Milos Kleint wrote:
> > this is not about mimicking old behaviour. The new code is plain
> > wrong for this case.
>
> Mimicking the behavior means making it work like the previous version.
>
> It would also have
On 12-Feb-08, at 8:16 AM, Milos Kleint wrote:
Jason,
this is not about mimicking old behaviour. The new code is plain wrong
for this case.
Mimicking the behavior means making it work like the previous version.
It would also have been nice if both you and Dan actually looked at
this before
Jason,
this is not about mimicking old behaviour. The new code is plain wrong
for this case.
When you define the archetype's groupId, artifactId and version on
command line, the plugin should not offer you a list to pick from.
That's especially tragic when the archetype you want is not in the
list
We can create a new goal name, whatever it be, and mimic the old
behavior.
The archetypes don't need to reside in central. I've been taking the
list off the Wiki and turning it into the internal catalog. We can
keep the list itself in that case for the command line. For the
Eclipse use ca
The new archetype plugin seems to have broken the normal instructions on
how to create new projects.It doesn't seem to work.
For example, according to:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAMEL/Creating+a+new+Spring+based+Camel+Route
I should just need to run:
mvn archetype:create
12 matches
Mail list logo
