Hi Robert,
having put some more thought into it I was thinking: maybe the IT
should prove that the jira issue integrates with the plugin. In that
case the name would be OK and I would also have a path for providing an
IT for MRELEASE-229. As of now there are no ITs for release:rollback.
I
Hi Clemens,
since the codebase is already rather old, you'll see that naming
convention has changed over the years.
Nowadays I prefer to to start with the JIRA id, followed by a very short
statement of the IT.
In the end I'm more important that there is at least a test than the name.
Just k
Clemens, why the issues cannot use Jira ID only?
If somebody wants to know more, she/he can still open Jira and see.
Another position is when you develop a new feature and then human readable
name should be used.
This way we know that we have more ITs for bug than originally TDD
features, or oposit
Hi,
I wrote unit tests with scm mocked away [0].
But IT: I do not know how and what.
Cheers, Clemens
[0]
https://github.com/apache/maven-release/pull/29/files#diff-bd93f43863e2917722a94ccc46af95a8
Am 17.07.2019 um 08:22 schrieb Olivier Lamy:
Hi
I understand it can be complicated to write such
Hi
I understand it can be complicated to write such it which need some scm..
Maybe write a unit at least?
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 05:20, Clemens Quoss wrote:
> Hi Olivier,
> yeah, could do that. Would be a great idea. But i am stuck on what to
> put into this IT:
> RemoveScmTag does what the na
Hi Olivier,
yeah, could do that. Would be a great idea. But i am stuck on what to
put into this IT:
RemoveScmTag does what the name suggests: it uses maven-scm to remove
the tag during release:rollback.
In the unit tests maven-scm is mocked away and i think in the ITs of
maven-release maven-
Hi
I agree the name is a bit confusing...
maybe name the IT: MRELEASE-229-RemoveScmTagPhase?
On Sun, 14 Jul 2019 at 20:06, Clemens Quoss wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> one more question regarding the name of the ITs in maven-release (or
> maybe generally):
>
> Seeing that the tests are named afte
Hello everyone,
one more question regarding the name of the ITs in maven-release (or
maybe generally):
Seeing that the tests are named after the jira issues i am wondering if
that would be the right thing to do.
Shouldn't they be named after the functionality they are testing?
I for my par
