On 16/11/2009, at 9:22 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Then I consider you lost. Go back and read what I wrote. At any rate this is
> not by biggest concern at the moment. If the conditions 1-3 are met in the
> last email and Larry says it's fine, I'm fine.
You top replied to several questions refe
On 2009-11-16, at 10:15 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
You've lost me.
Then I consider you lost. Go back and read what I wrote. At any rate
this is not by biggest concern at the moment. If the conditions 1-3
are met in the last email and Larry says it's fine, I'm fine.
Everything I see at htt
You've lost me.
Everything I see at
http://svn.sonatype.org/m2eclipse/sandbox/trunk/maven-performance-tests/ is
under the ALv2 accdg to headers except:
- the contents of a test maven repository
-
http://svn.sonatype.org/m2eclipse/sandbox/trunk/maven-performance-tests/remoteRepo/
which is a sub
If you can get Larry to sign off on:
1) We going to keep modifying the source as necessary
2) It's EPL and it should be that way because that's where we got it
from
3) And we might want to release it
I'm not going to discuss this ad nauseum because I believe Larry would
say technically it's
On 16/11/2009, at 7:35 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>
>>> We are likely to make some modifications, if we haven't already, and so
>>> it's easier not to put it here. If we made anything more then minimal
>>> changes we have to back it out.
>>
>> You mean
>> http://svn.sonatype.org/m2eclipse/san
On 2009-11-16, at 9:27 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 16/11/2009, at 7:14 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
The performance framework is EPL, which is not an authorized
license according to our documentation.
You mean org.eclipse.test.performance here?
We ar
On 16/11/2009, at 7:14 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
>
> The performance framework is EPL, which is not an authorized license
> according to our documentation.
You mean org.eclipse.test.performance here?
> We are likely to make some modifications, if we h
http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
The performance framework is EPL, which is not an authorized license
according to our documentation. We are likely to make some
modifications, if we haven't already, and so it's easier not to put it
here. If we made anything more then minimal changes
On Nov 15, 2009, at 3:47 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 15/11/2009, at 6:33 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>>> I think this is sonatype code that I don't have access to? Can somebody at
>>> Sonatype just run my code against the performance framework and see how it
>>> goes?
>>>
>>
>> We can gi
On 15/11/2009, at 6:33 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>> I think this is sonatype code that I don't have access to? Can somebody at
>> Sonatype just run my code against the performance framework and see how it
>> goes?
>>
>
> We can give you access. There are licensing problems with checking it in
There you go, it's all yours Dan :-)
On 2009-11-14, at 8:38 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
We can give you access.
Well,
http://svn.sonatype.org/m2eclipse/sandbox/trunk/maven-performance-tests/
is already public.
Benjamin
-
Jason van Zyl wrote:
We can give you access.
Well,
http://svn.sonatype.org/m2eclipse/sandbox/trunk/maven-performance-tests/
is already public.
Benjamin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For addit
On 2009-11-14, at 8:27 PM, Dan Fabulich wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Honestly there's not really any public proposal or design to look at
Got one now :-)
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Experimental+Multithreading+Support
and I really think that we should try your branch a
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Honestly there's not really any public proposal or design to look at
Got one now :-)
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Experimental+Multithreading+Support
and I really think that we should try your branch against the
performance framework and make sure ev
14 matches
Mail list logo
