> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 22 October 2003 09:17
> To: 'Maven Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Moving plugins
>
>
> > I will also take responsibility for moving the summit plugin
> > and the u
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 22 October 2003 08:41
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: Moving plugins
[snip]
> The touchstone could probably even go. I'm going to out a proposal
where
> the names of go
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 22 October 2003 09:05
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: Moving plugins
>
> Yo,
>
> There are also some plugins that we should push out of the nest.
>
> I was just chatti
> I will also take responsibility for moving the summit plugin
> and the uberjar plugin and move them into summit and
> classworlds respectively.
>
Can we just make sure that the doco still get links from Maven so users can
come through the maven site to see a fairly large list of plugins. I t
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 03:04, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Yo,
>
> There are also some plugins that we should push out of the nest.
>
> I was just chatting with Martin (a torque committer) to try and take
> responsibility for the Maven torque plugin and I think the same could be
> done with the Cactus p
> It shouldn't require that the plugins have maven as their
> groupId, i.e. if
> it's javaapp:blah, and the javaapp plugin is
Yeah, the extra groupId is only needed if there is a conflict I imagine. And
the maven one can take precedence :)
> At the moment we're waiting on Brett checking in a ne
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 22/10/2003 04:40:37 PM:
[snip good stuff]
> The touchstone could probably even go. I'm going to out a proposal where
> the names of goals are done in such a way that we follow the once
> established convention of : (e.g. jar:build). With this
> the goal
Yo,
There are also some plugins that we should push out of the nest.
I was just chatting with Martin (a torque committer) to try and take
responsibility for the Maven torque plugin and I think the same could be
done with the Cactus plugin where we have Apache projects with Maven
plugins.
The pro
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 02:45, Brett Porter wrote:
> > These below should go as well. The coupling on the license
> > plugin needs to be removed, multiproject certainly isn't
> > core, and neither is plugin.
> >
> > > - license
> > > - multiproject
> > > - touchstone
> > > - touchstone-partner
> >
> These below should go as well. The coupling on the license
> plugin needs to be removed, multiproject certainly isn't
> core, and neither is plugin.
>
> > - license
> > - multiproject
> > - touchstone
> > - touchstone-partner
> > - plugin
Isn't touchstone needed to test the maven code though?
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 00:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'd like to move the following plugins out of the core cvs module:
>
> - artifact
> - caller
> - changelog
> - changes
> - checkstyle
> - deploy
> - developer-activity
> - dist
> - ear
> - ejb
> - faq
> - file-activity
> - javadoc
> - jdepend
> > I wonder if it is also worth putting all of the report only plugins
> > into
> a
> > separate subdirectory.
>
> What about plugins that are report and something else like
> the javadoc
> plugin?
Yeah, you are right. If we are going to go down the categorisation path,
best do it properly a
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 22/10/2003 03:14:52 PM:
> +0, although I'm not sure what makes multiproject core.
Cool. I missed that one somehow. It's not used in bootstrap, so it could
move too.
> I wonder if it is also worth putting all of the report only plugins into
a
> separat
+0
Why don't you also move the multiplugin project?
Thanks
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 22 October 2003 06:58
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Moving plugins
>
> I'd like to move the follow
fy xmlns:deploy,
even though they don't use it. IIRC this won't actually break anything
though.
- Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 22 October 2003 2:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Mov
I'd like to move the following plugins out of the core cvs module:
- artifact
- caller
- changelog
- changes
- checkstyle
- deploy
- developer-activity
- dist
- ear
- ejb
- faq
- file-activity
- javadoc
- jdepend
- jellydoc
- junit-report
- jxr
- linkcheck
- scm
- site
- tasklist
- vdoclet
- war
-
Peter Donald wrote:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 12:17 am, Florin Vancea wrote:
If I may say something before it's too late: Maybe there is a need for a LATEST on each (or on several) branch (es).
Something like
log4j
log4j
LATEST
should get the latest-and-gratest, but something like
log4j
log
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 12:17 am, Florin Vancea wrote:
> If I may say something before it's too late: Maybe there is a need for a
> LATEST on each (or on several) branch (es).
>
> Something like
>
>
> log4j
> log4j
> LATEST
>
>
> should get the latest-and-gratest, but something like
>
>
> log
Hi,
Just a heads up. I'm moving some plugins on behalf of some devs:
- cactus (vincent)
- jboss (vincent)
- pmd (vincent)
- statcvs (vincent)
- jcoverage (emmanuel)
- uberjar (kaz)
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tambora.zenplex.org
In short, man creates for himself a new relig
van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 08 October 2003 07:41
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: RE: Moving Plugins
> >
> > On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 02:53, Vincent Massol wrote:
> >
> > > Agreed. In my opinion we should do both. We already start
- Original Message -
From: "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 8:30 AM
Subject: RE: Moving Plugins
> > - also, now that plugins are externalized it will be more di
Do you want me to move the one I listed in my previous mail or do you
want to do it?
Thanks
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 October 2003 07:41
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: Moving Plugins
>
> On
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 02:53, Vincent Massol wrote:
> Agreed. In my opinion we should do both. We already started the plugin
> move; we should finish it and not let it lie in mid-air.
Many have been moved and I've offered help to anyone who has plugins and
wants them moved. I have moved my own an
bably borrow the SNAPSHOT logic and modify it for use with
LATEST.
> Thanks!
> -Vincent
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 07 October 2003 22:09
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: Moving Plu
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 October 2003 09:10
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: Moving Plugins
[snip]
> > In addition, adding this declaration will download the maven jar
which
> > is unnecessar
"Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/10/2003 04:53:36 PM:
[snip]
> Agreed. In my opinion we should do both. We already started the plugin
> move; we should finish it and not let it lie in mid-air. I shall be able
> to help more in about 1-2 week's time now that my JUnit book is going to
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 October 2003 08:03
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: Moving Plugins
>
> "Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/10/2003 03:39:23
PM:
>
> &
"Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/10/2003 03:39:23 PM:
> Hi Jason,
>
> I'm fine with moving the following: Cactus, checkstyle, jboss, pmd,
> statcvs and actually all the other remaining plugins... I still don't
> understand why we need to keep any plugin at all in maven core. They
; To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Moving Plugins
>
> Howdy,
>
> Just another push. If you have plugins that are non-core and you want
me
> to move them over let me know. I think I'm looking at Vincent and
> Emmanuel as the next candidates :-)
>
> -
round
that never get run anyway.
- Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Garcia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 October 2003 10:18 AM
> To: 'Maven Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Moving Plugins
>
>
> Just to clarify, where are the non-co
st
> Subject: Moving Plugins
>
>
> Howdy,
>
> Just another push. If you have plugins that are non-core and
> you want me to move them over let me know. I think I'm
> looking at Vincent and Emmanuel as the next candidates :-)
>
> --
> jvz.
>
> Jason
Howdy,
Just another push. If you have plugins that are non-core and you want me
to move them over let me know. I think I'm looking at Vincent and
Emmanuel as the next candidates :-)
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tambora.zenplex.org
In short, man creates for himself a new relig
32 matches
Mail list logo
