Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>I think it would be better not to mess with it right now. But it's a fine
>>goal for a cleaner bootstrap - the bootstrap ant task can just pull down the
>>JARs from the repo.
>
> The bootstrap can just run the reactor in ../maven-plugins instead of
> src/plugins-build. I wo
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 18:24, Brett Porter wrote:
> > Are the memory leaks completely gone in RC2_UNSTABLE as they
> > are in RC1_REFACTOR? If so then then that's a big cross
> > section I won't look at.
>
> I think there is still one leak in the project loading (caused by betwixt?)
> but is very
> Are the memory leaks completely gone in RC2_UNSTABLE as they
> are in RC1_REFACTOR? If so then then that's a big cross
> section I won't look at.
I think there is still one leak in the project loading (caused by betwixt?)
but is very minor - a few kb per project I think.
I can rebuild all of m
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 November 2003 00:01
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: Moving all plugins to maven-plugins
>
> On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 17:24, Brett Porter wrote:
> > Jason,
> >
>
s a big cross section I won't look
at.
In RC1_REFACTOR I basically eliminated the use of Jelly/Ant until as
late as possible which is in the PluginManager which did in a big chunk
of the memory problem.
> - Brett
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason van Zyl [ma
I think that should be it.
- Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 14 November 2003 2:20 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Moving all plugins to maven-plugins
>
>
> Howdy,
>
> I am starting to compare MAVEN_
Howdy,
I am starting to compare MAVEN_RC1_REFACTOR, MAVEN_RC2_UNSTABLE and HEAD
and having copies of the core plugins in each of those is really
annoying.
Could we move all of the plugins to maven-plugins and figure out a
simple way to pull in what we consider core plugins for the bootstrap?
Thi
