Hi,
see here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/201503.mbox/%3C20150320213920.6AE4B17423%40minotaur.apache.org%3E
In contradiction to the mail we have decided to define the minimum Maven
version 3.0 ...
Based on the minimum we have decided (3.0) this means JDK 6 minimum...
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Christian Schulte
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know this has been discussed before. I do not find relevant thread(s).
> What was/is still the reason for keeping things targetted at Java 6?
> Whenever I stumble upon something with '-target <1.7', can I just set it
> to '-t
Hello,
I know this has been discussed before. I do not find relevant thread(s).
What was/is still the reason for keeping things targetted at Java 6?
Whenever I stumble upon something with '-target <1.7', can I just set it
to '-target 1.7'? I would like to use Java 7 features as soon as
possible. T
Emmanuel Venisse venisse.net> writes:
> >> Brett talked about the possibility to fork builds with Continuum [3].
> >
> > Continuum always forks builds. However, controlling the JDK it used was
> > not easy. I do believe profiles support will be in the next release and
> > will make it easy.
>
Brett Porter a écrit :
On 11/07/2007, at 10:32 AM, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
Hello guys,
we had an issue recently with Continuum on Cocoon and continuous
integration
which fails to check JDK 1.4 compliance of Cocoon's code base since
Continuum
itself is running with a JDK 5 (in that particula
t de Joerg Heinicke
Envoyé : mercredi 11 juillet 2007 02:33
À : dev@maven.apache.org
Objet : Continuum and minimum JDK requirement
Hello guys,
we had an issue recently with Continuum on Cocoon and continuous integration
which fails to check JDK 1.4 compliance of Cocoon's code base since Conti
Dear God, I am so happy to hear that. I swear, I wish I had more
time to track this and contribute, but I'm really really impressed by
this whole team and the progression of this product over the last
year or so.
Christian.
On Jul 10, 2007, at 10:42 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
just fyi,
just fyi, we are working on getting that profile enabled version
released in the next couple of weeks
jesse
On 7/10/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/07/2007, at 10:32 AM, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> we had an issue recently with Continuum on Cocoon and continuous
>
On 11/07/2007, at 10:32 AM, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
Hello guys,
we had an issue recently with Continuum on Cocoon and continuous
integration
which fails to check JDK 1.4 compliance of Cocoon's code base since
Continuum
itself is running with a JDK 5 (in that particular case it was
usage of
Hello guys,
we had an issue recently with Continuum on Cocoon and continuous integration
which fails to check JDK 1.4 compliance of Cocoon's code base since Continuum
itself is running with a JDK 5 (in that particular case it was usage of
ThreadLocal.remove() [1]). I found the thread about raising
10 matches
Mail list logo
