I don't see the need for either, since the trunk set is a superset of
what is on the branch.
Kenney Westerhof wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
Just tossing in an idea:
Perhaps a more sophisticated system where you specify which version of
maven is needed for the it test - esp
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
Just tossing in an idea:
Perhaps a more sophisticated system where you specify which version of
maven is needed for the it test - especially useful for new feature
testing that's not available in some versions of m2. So instead
of #commenting out you hav
I think the question here is, should we merge the itxxx folders and
then just have the test deactivated in the branch? that would make the
differencies between trunk and branch minimal which I see as a good
thing (TM)
On 6/12/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
jerome lacoste wrote:
> So
jerome lacoste wrote:
Someone might want to create a test case for a branch issue without
looking at the trunk. And it's better to keep itest ids synchronized.
That would be against our development practices we agreed on a while
back (everything goes through trunk).
The only scenario would b
On 6/9/06, Kenney Westerhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
Carlos,
> Kenney, could you check it0105 and it0107 and merge its revisions them
> to the 2.0.x branch, or does it not apply?
it0107 is related to MNG-2293 which is only applied to trunk, so that o
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
[snip]
> > it0105.. that's a long time ago. Looking at the issue (MRESOURCES-18),
> > it's intended for 2.2 (although it's fixed in trunk so it'll be in 2.1
> > too).
> >
> > I haven't found the cause for this bug yet, but the problem does not
> > occur i
On 6/9/06, Kenney Westerhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
Carlos,
> Kenney, could you check it0105 and it0107 and merge its revisions them
> to the 2.0.x branch, or does it not apply?
it0107 is related to MNG-2293 which is only applied to trunk, so that o
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
Carlos,
> Kenney, could you check it0105 and it0107 and merge its revisions them
> to the 2.0.x branch, or does it not apply?
it0107 is related to MNG-2293 which is only applied to trunk, so that one
doesn't make any sense to commit to the 2.0.x branch.
Kenney, could you check it0105 and it0107 and merge its revisions them
to the 2.0.x branch, or does it not apply?
Thanks
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
-
