the current state of webdav clients really is kinda stunning from what
I have seenkinda weird
jesse
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 04/10/2008, at 1:41 AM, Oleg Gusakov wrote:
>
>> James,
>>
>> James William Dumay wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey Oleg,
>>> Cu
On 04/10/2008, at 1:41 AM, Oleg Gusakov wrote:
James,
James William Dumay wrote:
Hey Oleg,
Curious, will the Mecury wagon provider be the new handler for the
dav:
protocol extension?
Yes - Mercury replaces a dav protocol wagon handler if this is the
question.
It does not claim to hand
James William Dumay wrote:
Very cool :) - Can't wait to try this out.
You can - right away :) I opened a vote to promote it - subject "[VOTE]
release and promote Mercury 1.0.0-alpha-1" and attached maven 2.1-M2-SN
binary bundle for folks to try it out.
I myself am using this version si
Oleg,
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 08:41 -0700, Oleg Gusakov wrote:
> Yes - Mercury replaces a dav protocol wagon handler if this is the
> question.
>
> It does not claim to handle entire DAV protocol, including
> versioning,
> etc. It implements a subset that allows to PUT resources to the
> server:
James,
James William Dumay wrote:
Hey Oleg,
Curious, will the Mecury wagon provider be the new handler for the dav:
protocol extension?
Yes - Mercury replaces a dav protocol wagon handler if this is the
question.
It does not claim to handle entire DAV protocol, including versioning,
etc.
On 3-Oct-08, at 1:34 AM, Oleg Gusakov wrote:
I have been testing Mercury wagon provider with 2.2.x and 2.1.x
branches and successfully pass all the ITs but one, please see the
tracking comments in http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MERCURY-8 and
it's subtasks
The missing test - it0031 - dea
Hey Oleg,
Curious, will the Mecury wagon provider be the new handler for the dav:
protocol extension?
Cheers
James
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 22:34 -0700, Oleg Gusakov wrote:
> I have been testing Mercury wagon provider with 2.2.x and 2.1.x branches
> and successfully pass all the ITs but one, please
I have been testing Mercury wagon provider with 2.2.x and 2.1.x branches
and successfully pass all the ITs but one, please see the tracking
comments in http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MERCURY-8 and it's subtasks
The missing test - it0031 - deals with plugin alias remapping, which
happens well
