I think this is a bug in Safari that we haven't figured out how to get
around yet. Is that what you were using?
On 14/02/2009, at 2:38 AM, David A Smith wrote:
Gentlemen,
There is a defect on the Maven download web page:
http://maven.apache.org/download.html
If you click on the "mirror"
Gentlemen,
There is a defect on the Maven download web page:
http://maven.apache.org/download.html
If you click on the "mirror" column of the "Maven 2.0.9 (tar.gz)" row,
instead of getting a link to a page of mirror names (as you do with other
rows of this column) you get a gzipped html fi
Odea Ching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just an FYI, the classes in the Maven 1.x Model javadocs (Maven website)
are duplicated:
http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/reference/maven-model/3.0.2/apidocs/index.html
Thanks,
Deng
-
n the Maven 1.x Model javadocs (Maven website)
are duplicated:
http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/reference/maven-model/3.0.2/apidocs/index.html
Thanks,
Deng
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-m
Just an FYI, the classes in the Maven 1.x Model javadocs (Maven website)
are duplicated:
http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/reference/maven-model/3.0.2/apidocs/index.html
Thanks,
Deng
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
2007/3/11, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Okay, r516945 looks like it's just for individual pages. I think Tom
was asking about publishing the entire site for each version, which
was discussed a bit last year.
Yes, that's the word. I think it would be easier to maintain and
prepare the sit
On 11 Mar 07, at 5:57 PM 11 Mar 07, Brett Porter wrote:
On 11/03/2007, at 9:46 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 11 Mar 07, at 1:56 AM 11 Mar 07, TslH wrote:
Hi,
(first of all, please forgive my low-level in english)
I'm currently looking into the maven website. If I hadn't ma
On 11/03/2007, at 9:46 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 11 Mar 07, at 1:56 AM 11 Mar 07, TslH wrote:
Hi,
(first of all, please forgive my low-level in english)
I'm currently looking into the maven website. If I hadn't make
mistake, there's no branches of the site for the di
On 3/11/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The script I checked in. The eternal magic of sed. Using $
{project.version} to prepare for putting the POM in a Velocity
context as "project".
Okay, r516945 looks like it's just for individual pages. I think Tom
was asking about publishing
On 11 Mar 07, at 10:27 AM 11 Mar 07, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 3/11/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just started trying to
track project references and replacing them with a variable that can
be interpolated. Until the site plugin works to interpolate project
information this will
On 3/11/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just started trying to
track project references and replacing them with a variable that can
be interpolated. Until the site plugin works to interpolate project
information this will do.
Do you mean using ${version} in apt and having it rep
On 11 Mar 07, at 1:56 AM 11 Mar 07, TslH wrote:
Hi,
(first of all, please forgive my low-level in english)
I'm currently looking into the maven website. If I hadn't make
mistake, there's no branches of the site for the different release.
Isn't there a way to improve t
On 3/11/07, TslH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm currently looking into the maven website. If I hadn't make
mistake, there's no branches of the site for the different release.
Isn't there a way to improve the website coherency?
...
Can I suggest to apply the same k
Hi,
(first of all, please forgive my low-level in english)
I'm currently looking into the maven website. If I hadn't make
mistake, there's no branches of the site for the different release.
Isn't there a way to improve the website coherency?
Here an example: there&#
14 matches
Mail list logo
