RE: minor typo in maven documentation (patch)

2015-07-07 Thread Sander Verhagen
ent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 8:23 > To: dev@maven.apache.org > Subject: minor typo in maven documentation (patch) > > See attached. > > > Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven

minor typo in maven documentation (patch)

2015-07-07 Thread Jonathan Dowland
See attached. Thanks Index: apt/guides/introduction/introduction-to-profiles.apt === --- apt/guides/introduction/introduction-to-profiles.apt (revision 1689671) +++ apt/guides/introduction/introduction-to-profiles.apt (working copy)

RE: Where to create JIRA issues for Maven documentation?

2008-03-24 Thread Brian E. Fox
. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 8:04 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Where to create JIRA issues for Maven documentation? > But whatever I don't care as long as it's easy and _obvious_. Adding a descriptio

Re: Where to create JIRA issues for Maven documentation?

2008-03-24 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
But whatever I don't care as long as it's easy and _obvious_. Adding a description to the JIRA project MNG, that provides a hyperlink to MNGSITE and some hinting words might further help to direct users to the right place. It took me over a minute to find the right project (and I knew that it

Re: Where to create JIRA issues for Maven documentation?

2008-03-24 Thread Jason van Zyl
f other random stuff on the default dashboard. -Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 7:35 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Where to create JIRA issues for Maven documentation? Yah, I actually agree with Dennis. I prefer them separate so I

RE: Where to create JIRA issues for Maven documentation?

2008-03-24 Thread Brian E. Fox
a bunch of other random stuff on the default dashboard. -Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 7:35 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Where to create JIRA issues for Maven documentation? Yah, I actually agree with Dennis. I

Re: Where to create JIRA issues for Maven documentation?

2008-03-24 Thread Jason van Zyl
to find if it's a component of MNG rather than separate. So I would suggest we move MNGSITE over to MNG. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 11:39 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Where to create JIRA issues for Mave

Re: Where to create JIRA issues for Maven documentation?

2008-03-24 Thread Dennis Lundberg
onday, March 24, 2008 11:39 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Where to create JIRA issues for Maven documentation? Hi, It seems there are currently two places in JIRA to fill in issues regarding documentation: - the components "Documentation: *" in project MNG and - the project M

RE: Where to create JIRA issues for Maven documentation?

2008-03-24 Thread Brian E. Fox
ect: Where to create JIRA issues for Maven documentation? Hi, It seems there are currently two places in JIRA to fill in issues regarding documentation: - the components "Documentation: *" in project MNG and - the project MNGSITE Is this situation by design, i.e. are the projects/com

Where to create JIRA issues for Maven documentation?

2008-03-24 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, It seems there are currently two places in JIRA to fill in issues regarding documentation: - the components "Documentation: *" in project MNG and - the project MNGSITE Is this situation by design, i.e. are the projects/components intended for different purposes/audiences, or could we move

Re: [site] Maven documentation thoughts

2007-05-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
g. On 25 May 07, at 2:02 PM 25 May 07, Henri Yandell wrote: > I didn't notice any threads on the doc organization topic, so thought > I'd start one. Apologies if I missed the right place, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the > noisiest list I'm on. > > Compare and contrast

Re: [site] Maven documentation thoughts

2007-05-25 Thread Henri Yandell
gt;> >> - Brett >> >> On 26/05/2007, at 4:02 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> >> > I didn't notice any threads on the doc organization topic, so >> thought >> > I'd start one. Apologies if I missed the right place, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> is the &

Re: [site] Maven documentation thoughts

2007-05-25 Thread Henri Yandell
Apologies if I missed the right place, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the > noisiest list I'm on. > > Compare and contrast: > > http://maven.apache.org/guides/ > > and > > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/ > > --- > > Firstly, there is no real Maven documentation home p

Re: [site] Maven documentation thoughts

2007-05-25 Thread Brett Porter
n 26/05/2007, at 4:02 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > I didn't notice any threads on the doc organization topic, so thought > I'd start one. Apologies if I missed the right place, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the > noisiest list I'm on. > > Compare and contrast: > &g

Re: [site] Maven documentation thoughts

2007-05-25 Thread Henri Yandell
AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > I didn't notice any threads on the doc organization topic, so thought > I'd start one. Apologies if I missed the right place, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the > noisiest list I'm on. > > Compare and contrast: > > http://maven.apache.org/guides/ >

Re: [site] Maven documentation thoughts

2007-05-25 Thread Brett Porter
httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/ --- Firstly, there is no real Maven documentation home page. It's a part of the front page, which clashes with the sheer amount of space that news, announcement and other things need. So suggested step 1: We need a documentation page. Secondly, it's obvious that much of th

Re: [site] Maven documentation thoughts

2007-05-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
e. Apologies if I missed the right place, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the noisiest list I'm on. Compare and contrast: http://maven.apache.org/guides/ and http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/ --- Firstly, there is no real Maven documentation home page. It's a part of the front page, which clas

Re: [site] Maven documentation thoughts

2007-05-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
des/ and http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/ --- Firstly, there is no real Maven documentation home page. It's a part of the front page, which clashes with the sheer amount of space that news, announcement and other things need. So suggested step 1: We need a documentation page. +1 Se

[site] Maven documentation thoughts

2007-05-25 Thread Henri Yandell
ly, there is no real Maven documentation home page. It's a part of the front page, which clashes with the sheer amount of space that news, announcement and other things need. So suggested step 1: We need a documentation page. Secondly, it's obvious that much of the httpd page concerns mod_

RE: Maven documentation build with multiproject plugin

2003-07-29 Thread Michal Maczka
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 7:12 AM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: Maven documentation build with multiproject plugin > > Michal, the attachment wasn't in the email > -- > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting > Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/peop

Re: Maven documentation build with multiproject plugin

2003-07-28 Thread dion
Michal, the attachment wasn't in the email -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ "Michal Maczka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29/07/2003 05:55:43 AM: > I have made an attempt to generalize the page > which shows overview of subproject build v

Maven documentation build with multiproject plugin

2003-07-28 Thread Michal Maczka
I have made an attempt to generalize the page which shows overview of subproject build via multiproject plugin. Here you can find an sample output. Note that on the top of the page I am using ${pom.shortDescription} and for subsections ${pom.description} In case of maven plugins this web page is

Re: Maven documentation

2003-06-03 Thread dion
Gabriel, I hope u haven't taken me the wrong way, I'd love to get some more docs for both the plugins and the core. Please help us! It'd be helpful to know what people think the shortcomings are for the docs. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/W

Re: Maven documentation

2003-06-03 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 22:15, Gabriel Sjoberg wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >However to say that much of the project has little or no documentation is > >a little misleading. I believe all plugins have a little documentation and > >that there is a chunk of docs for the core. > > > > > I

Re: Maven documentation

2003-06-03 Thread Gabriel Sjoberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However to say that much of the project has little or no documentation is a little misleading. I believe all plugins have a little documentation and that there is a chunk of docs for the core. I will not disagree that there is some documentation; what documentation e

Re: Maven documentation

2003-06-03 Thread dion
I'm +1 on docs. However to say that much of the project has little or no documentation is a little misleading. I believe all plugins have a little documentation and that there is a chunk of docs for the core. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://www.freeroller.net/page/dion/We

RE: Maven documentation

2003-06-03 Thread EPugh
PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Maven documentation Much of the maven project has little or no documentation, so I have started to write some simple docs, starting with the plugins. I am going to write them as I find the need. If anyone wants something specific documented let me know. I don&#

Maven documentation

2003-06-03 Thread xabbu
Much of the maven project has little or no documentation, so I have started to write some simple docs, starting with the plugins. I am going to write them as I find the need. If anyone wants something specific documented let me know. I don't have any upload access, so I will be submitting dif