RE: Maven and repository@apache.org

2005-01-05 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> IMO we should [make] the Maven artifact handling better > and used by all Apache and non-Apache projects. Is Maven willing to provide suitable support for Ant to use it? I just want to make sure that this is not the Maven repository, but is THE repository. Tool-agnostic. --- Noel ---

Re: Maven and repository@apache.org

2005-01-05 Thread Brett Porter
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: What relationship does the repository list have with Maven? What relationship does Maven have with the repository list? I see when it started in early 2003, Maven folk of the time were quite active. Even though Mark recently did some wiki updates, only Nicola, myself and

Re: Maven and repository@apache.org

2005-01-05 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Wednesday 05 January 2005 16:39, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: The Depot project SVN is still there, ready to be used if/when needed by the Maven project. From the Magic project we have spun off what we call Transit, which provides a simple, flexible and powerful solution to

Maven and repository@apache.org

2005-01-05 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Now that Depot has closed doors, the need for Apache-wide artifact handling has remained, and Maven is the only actor here that is willing and able to pursue this road. What relationship does the repository list have with Maven? What relationship does Maven have with the repository list? Ass Bre

Re: Maven and repository@apache.org

2005-01-05 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 16:39, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > The Depot project SVN > is still there, ready to be used if/when needed by the Maven project. >From the Magic project we have spun off what we call Transit, which provides a simple, flexible and powerful solution to artifact manageme