lopers List
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 10:30 PM
> Subject: Re: Maven Plugins annotations support @Component role attribute to
> Class
>
> On 5/21/12 7:03 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> 2012/5/21 Brett Porter:
>>>
>>> On 21/05/2012, at 3:45 AM, Herv
iginal Message -
>
> > From: Olivier Lamy
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 5:06 PM
> > Subject: Re: Maven Plugins annotations support @Component role attribute
> > to Class>
> > 2012/5/21 Brett Porter :
> >
sage -
>
> > From: Brett Porter
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 7:22 AM
> > Subject: Re: Maven Plugins annotations support @Component role attribute
> > to Class>
> > On 21/05/2012, at 3:45 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY
On 5/21/12 7:03 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
2012/5/21 Brett Porter:
On 21/05/2012, at 3:45 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
here, the end-user is a plugin developer, then someone who should be able to
create a (Plexus) component when necessary
Yes, I liked @Component too but as soon as you write a compo
strub
- Original Message -
> From: Olivier Lamy
> To: Maven Developers List
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 5:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Maven Plugins annotations support @Component role attribute to
> Class
>
> 2012/5/21 Brett Porter :
>>
>> On 21/05/2012, at
2012/5/21 Brett Porter :
>
> On 21/05/2012, at 9:03 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
>> 2012/5/21 Brett Porter :
>>>
>>> On 21/05/2012, at 3:45 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
>>>
here, the end-user is a plugin developer, then someone who should be able
to
create a (Plexus) component when necessa
On 21/05/2012, at 9:03 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/5/21 Brett Porter :
>>
>> On 21/05/2012, at 3:45 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
>>
>>> here, the end-user is a plugin developer, then someone who should be able to
>>> create a (Plexus) component when necessary
>>>
>>> Yes, I liked @Component too
2012/5/21 Brett Porter :
>
> On 21/05/2012, at 3:45 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
>
>> here, the end-user is a plugin developer, then someone who should be able to
>> create a (Plexus) component when necessary
>>
>> Yes, I liked @Component too but as soon as you write a component and inject
>> somponent
ike a @Qualifier (kind of a typesafe bean 'name') which gets used on
both?
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
> From: Brett Porter
> To: Maven Developers List
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 7:22 AM
> Subject: Re: Maven Plugins annotations support @Compon
On 21/05/2012, at 3:45 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> here, the end-user is a plugin developer, then someone who should be able to
> create a (Plexus) component when necessary
>
> Yes, I liked @Component too but as soon as you write a component and inject
> somponents inside it, you discover the d
Am 20.05.2012 19:46 schrieb "Hervé BOUTEMY" :
>
> here, the end-user is a plugin developer, then someone who should be able
to
> create a (Plexus) component when necessary
>
> Yes, I liked @Component too but as soon as you write a component and
inject
> somponents inside it, you discover the discre
here, the end-user is a plugin developer, then someone who should be able to
create a (Plexus) component when necessary
Yes, I liked @Component too but as soon as you write a component and inject
somponents inside it, you discover the discrepency: the more I work on this,
the more I discover th
for sure you can use
@Component( role = ArtifactMetadataSource.class, roleHint = "maven" )
protected Object artifactMetadataSource;
:-)
2012/5/20 Mirko Friedenhagen :
> Hello Olivier,
>
> hopefully the role and the type of the member are not always redundant :-):
>
> --- snip ---
> @Component(
Perso, I prefer @Component more "auto documented" name.
IMHO The goal is to hide to end user what is used in core so why using
plexus naming.
2012/5/20 Hervé BOUTEMY :
> of course, +1 since we discussed it :)
>
> but thinking once more at it, I just found that @Component should be renamed
> to @Re
of course, +1 since we discussed it :)
but thinking once more at it, I just found that @Component should be renamed
to @Requirement, to match corresponding plexus annotation, isn't it?
Regards,
Hervé
Le dimanche 20 mai 2012 09:00:05 Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> After discussion on irc wit
Hello Olivier,
hopefully the role and the type of the member are not always redundant :-):
--- snip ---
@Component( role = ArtifactMetadataSource.class, roleHint = "maven" )
protected ArtifactMetadataSource artifactMetadataSource;
--- snap ---
Regards Mirko
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Ro
+1
Robert
Op Sun, 20 May 2012 09:00:05 +0200 schreef Olivier Lamy :
Hi,
After discussion on irc with Hervé, I think role attribute in
@Component can be of type Class rather than String.
@Component( role = ArtifactMetadataSource.class, roleHint = "maven" )
protected ArtifactMetadataSo
Hi,
After discussion on irc with Hervé, I think role attribute in
@Component can be of type Class rather than String.
@Component( role = ArtifactMetadataSource.class, roleHint = "maven" )
protected ArtifactMetadataSource artifactMetadataSource;
Any objections on this change ?
Thanks,
--
18 matches
Mail list logo
