I think there is nothing wrong in the project releasing official
`Dockerfile`s... that's just source code, which is what we release.
If Docker or A.N.Other then wants to go and build images from those
`Dockerfile`s then that's fine with me.
On 22 October 2017 at 01:22, Michael Osipov wrote:
> A
Am 2017-10-22 um 04:24 schrieb Manfred Moser:
Following up on that remark and my earlier remark that we should NOT make this
official .. here are my remarks:
- so far the only binaries we assemble and call official are the tar.gz and zip
archives (and even that is a gray line since official th
Following up on that remark and my earlier remark that we should NOT make this
official .. here are my remarks:
- so far the only binaries we assemble and call official are the tar.gz and zip
archives (and even that is a gray line since official there are only sources
from Apache)
- we do NOT s
t; >> >
> > > >> > herve.bout...@free.fr>
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > >> > great idea
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> >
t;
> > >> > > >> > Regards,
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > Hervé
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > Le jeudi 19 octobre 2017, 13:47:45 CEST Mike Drob a
> > > >> >>
> >> > > >> >> On 2017-10-19 03:50, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> >> > > >> >> > Arnaud is correct, I sent an email to users@ back on Fri,
> &
t; >> >> I
> >> > > >> >> didn't go back far enough.
> >> > > >> >>
> >> > > >> >> I think moving these Dockerfiles into an ASF repo would be
> >> great
> >> >
> >> > for
> >> >
&g
t;> >> > > We can easily see with him to improve this IMO.>
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > When he started that (several years ago) Docker wasn't
what it
>
12 Arnaud H�ritier
> > > >> >> > wrote:>
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > > These images are kindly managed by a PMC member of our project
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> (Carlos)
> > > >> >>
> >
can easily see with him to improve this IMO.>
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > When he started that (several years ago) Docker wasn't what it
> is
> > >> >>
> > >> >> nowadays.>
> > >&g
gt;> >>
> >> >> > > With docker being mainstream I agree that we can reconsider this.>
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > The docker image build/distribution could perhaps be part of our
> >> >>
> >> >> release>
> >> >>
build/distribution could perhaps be part of our
>> >>
>> >> release>
>> >>
>> >> > > process.>
>> >> > >
>> >> > > WDYT Carlos ?>
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On Thu, Oct 1
>> community>
> >>
> >> > > > would consider publishing an official set of images? Or
> >>
> >> alternatively>
> >>
> >> > > > whether they should send a takedown notice to protect their brand
> >>
> >&
m the github URL this is NOT an apache
URL.>
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/carlossg/docker-maven>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike Drob wrote on 2017-10-18 16:32:>
> > > >
> > > > > Hello,>
>
gt;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > With docker being mainstream I agree that we can reconsider
> > > >
> > > > this.>
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > The docker image build/distribution could perhaps be part
> of
> > our
&
; > > > > > The docker image build/distribution could perhaps be part of
> our
> > > > > >
> > > > > > release>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > process.>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > WDYT Carlos
release>
> > > > >
> > > > > > > process.>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > WDYT Carlos ?>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017
ct 19, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Mike Drob
> > > wrote:>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I guess the natural follow-on question is whether the Maven
> > > >
> > > > community&
t; > >
> > > > > > would consider publishing an official set of images? Or
> > >
> > > alternatively>
> > >
> > > > > > whether they should send a takedown notice to protect their brand
> > >
> > > and>
&g
t; >
> > > > > would consider publishing an official set of images? Or
> >
> > alternatively>
> >
> > > > > whether they should send a takedown notice to protect their brand
> >
> > and>
> >
>
nd a takedown notice to protect their brand
>
> and>
>
> > > > trademarks...>
> > > >
> > > > On 2017-10-18 18:36, "Manfred Moser" wrote:>
> > > >
> > > > > No. As you can see from the github URL this i
21 matches
Mail list logo
