he proposed
>> > > > solution was to use the (legacy) ASF dist area *and* Central to get
>> > > > the best of both worlds. Do you see a problem having 2 data sources
>> > > > for the Jenkins crawler?
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, M
*and* Central to get
> > > > the best of both worlds. Do you see a problem having 2 data sources
> > > > for the Jenkins crawler?
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Arnaud Héritier <
> aherit...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > >
> > &g
ces
> > > for the Jenkins crawler?
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Arnaud Héritier >
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > Resurrecting this thread.
> > > > Having a standardised place to find all versions was a good thing
> >
he Jenkins crawler?
> >
> > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Arnaud Héritier
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Resurrecting this thread.
> > > Having a standardised place to find all versions was a good thing
> > > Because of the change jenkins doesn't
t; On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>> >
>> >> Why don't you just use Maven Central. Those copies are not going
>> anywhere.
>> >>
>> >> On May 21, 2015, at 6:02 PM, Arnaud Héritier
>> wrote:
>> >
;
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Arnaud Héritier
> wrote:
> > Resurrecting this thread.
> > Having a standardised place to find all versions was a good thing
> > Because of the change jenkins doesn't propose anything > 3.2.2 because it
> > is checking onl
crawler?
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
> Resurrecting this thread.
> Having a standardised place to find all versions was a good thing
> Because of the change jenkins doesn't propose anything > 3.2.2 because it
> is checking only in http://archive.a
andardised place to find all versions was a good thing
> >> > Because of the change jenkins doesn't propose anything > 3.2.2
> because it
> >> > is checking only in http://archive.apache.org/dist/maven/binaries/
> >> > And it doesn't see the cont
M, Arnaud Héritier
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Resurrecting this thread.
> >>> Having a standardised place to find all versions was a good thing
> >>> Because of the change jenkins doesn't propose anything > 3.2.2 because
> it
> >>> is ch
l. Those copies are not going anywhere.
>>
>> On May 21, 2015, at 6:02 PM, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
>>
>> > Resurrecting this thread.
>> > Having a standardised place to find all versions was a good thing
>> > Because of the change jenkins doesn't prop
;> Resurrecting this thread.
>>> Having a standardised place to find all versions was a good thing
>>> Because of the change jenkins doesn't propose anything > 3.2.2 because it
>>> is checking only in http://archive.apache.org/dist/maven/binaries/
>>&g
> 3.2.2 because it
> > is checking only in http://archive.apache.org/dist/maven/binaries/
> > And it doesn't see the content of https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist
> > /release/maven/maven-3/
> > Sadly no central isn't a better solution
> > * >= 2.0.9 :
> >
ing > 3.2.2 because it
> is checking only in http://archive.apache.org/dist/maven/binaries/
> And it doesn't see the content of https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist
> /release/maven/maven-3/
> Sadly no central isn't a better solution
> * >= 2.0.9 :
> http://repo.
Resurrecting this thread.
Having a standardised place to find all versions was a good thing
Because of the change jenkins doesn't propose anything > 3.2.2 because it
is checking only in http://archive.apache.org/dist/maven/binaries/
And it doesn't see the content of https://dist.apa
apache.org/repos/dist/release/maven/maven-3/
> >
> > IIRC, http://archive.apache.org/dist/maven/binaries/ was used by Jenkins
> > folks
> > for automatic Maven version discovery and download, before the change
> >
> > seems like we didn't took the
t"
Betreff: Re: 3.2.3 not available
thoughhttp://archive.apache.org/dist/maven/binaries/?
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY
wrote:
> we generally switched Maven release canonical download area to
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/maven/maven-3/
>
> IIRC
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY
wrote:
> we generally switched Maven release canonical download area to
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/maven/maven-3/
>
> IIRC, http://archive.apache.org/dist/maven/binaries/ was used by Jenkins
> folks
> for autom
Why do you need it there?
The way binaries are kept at Apache is inconsistent. How it evolved over time
where things disappear from one place to another (official distribution to
archives) I don't find makes much sense but that's the way it is. If you
require a distribution in a standard place
we generally switched Maven release canonical download area to
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/maven/maven-3/
IIRC, http://archive.apache.org/dist/maven/binaries/ was used by Jenkins folks
for automatic Maven version discovery and download, before the change
seems like we didn&#
Hello,
for some reason 3.2.3 is not available in the archives, is that intentional
or something went wrong with the 3.2.5 release?
Thanks
Milos
On 28 May 07, at 5:13 PM 28 May 07, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 5/28/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If one looks here:
http://www.apache.org/dist/maven/binaries/
You'll notice that there's nothing but 2.0.6 there? Where did our
binaries go? The mirrors don't w
On 5/28/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If one looks here:
http://www.apache.org/dist/maven/binaries/
You'll notice that there's nothing but 2.0.6 there? Where did our
binaries go? The mirrors don't work for people trying to get older
versions which is cra
Hi,
If one looks here:
http://www.apache.org/dist/maven/binaries/
You'll notice that there's nothing but 2.0.6 there? Where did our
binaries go? The mirrors don't work for people trying to get older
versions which is crappy. Anyone know what happened?
23 matches
Mail list logo
