Re: Maven 3.x: Dependency Management

2009-01-09 Thread Ralph Goers
I think I may need a concrete example to make sure I understand the issue properly. However, in my opinion dependency management specifications should be used for anything not explicitly specified. For example, parent foo 1.0.0 runtime parent ch

Re: Maven 3.x: Dependency Management

2009-01-09 Thread Shane Isbell
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Oleg Gusakov wrote: > > Shane Isbell wrote: > >> I've run into an issue where the current behavior of building a project >> model in Maven 2.0.x seems wrong. In the case of inheritance of dependency >> scope, there is a default value of "compile". This default will

Re: Maven 3.x: Dependency Management

2009-01-09 Thread Oleg Gusakov
Shane Isbell wrote: I've run into an issue where the current behavior of building a project model in Maven 2.0.x seems wrong. In the case of inheritance of dependency scope, there is a default value of "compile". This default will override the parent scope. This part is correct. But if the depen

Maven 3.x: Dependency Management

2009-01-09 Thread Shane Isbell
I've run into an issue where the current behavior of building a project model in Maven 2.0.x seems wrong. In the case of inheritance of dependency scope, there is a default value of "compile". This default will override the parent scope. This part is correct. But if the dependency scope is not spec